Frozen snapshot 1 May 2026 – 31 May 2026 Edition 3 June 2026

The world’s most comprehensive EOR review dataOriginal data, not available anywhere else

The EOR Index: June 2026

June 2026 edition. Reporting window: 1 May 2026 – 31 May 2026. Built on 384 public reviews and 842 practitioner observations, 487 of them off-market, across 18 EOR providers.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the June 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 384 public reviews published between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026. The top three were: first place, Deel at 4.6; second place, Teamed at 4.3; third place, Rippling at 4.2; Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored lowest at 3.5.

3.9 / 5

Category index

384

Public reviews

18

Providers scored

Trust

Dominant field affect · 28%

Why this is the most comprehensive EOR review

1,226

The most comprehensive EOR review

18 EOR providers, 6 data sources and 1,226 data points in the June 2026 edition: public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot, plus practitioner conversations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

487

The only EOR review with off-market, proprietary data

487 observations this month came from Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups: conversations between People Ops and global employment operators that public review sites never see. This data is not available anywhere else.

31 days

Current monthly EOR review scores

Every score uses only reviews and conversations published 1 May 2026 – 31 May 2026. Lifetime star averages can be years old; this is a real snapshot of what buyers are experiencing now.

Best EOR providers in June 2026, ranked

18 providers with at least one public review in this edition’s reporting window, ordered by score (ties by number of reviews). Each card shows the citable sentence, what reviewers wrote about, and how operators feel.

Sort by
  1. Highest public-review sentiment · June 2026
    1

    Deel

    New 54 reviews Field: Frustration 52% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    54
    90-day
    3.9 n=54
    Rank
    1 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness28%
    • platform usability19%
    • payroll accuracy15%

    Deel scored 4.6 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 54 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Deel reviews in the June 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 28% of reviews (15 of 54). Platform usability was second at 19% (10).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=107

    • Frustration 52%
    • Mid 21%
    • Trust 16%
    • Expertise 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Deel in the June 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 52% of 107 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 21% (23).

    Review sources

    • G2 20
    • Capterra 17
    • Trustpilot 17

    Full Deel profile →

  2. 2

    Teamed

    New 40 reviews Field: Trust 43% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.3 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    40
    90-day
    4.3 n=40
    Rank
    2 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness20%
    • support quality20%
    • payroll accuracy18%

    Teamed scored 4.3 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 40 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Teamed reviews in the June 2026 edition were support responsiveness and support quality, each appearing in 20% of reviews (8 of 40).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=65

    • Trust 43%
    • Expertise 25%
    • Frustration 14%
    • Mid 14%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Teamed in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 43% of 65 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 25% (16).

    Review sources

    • G2 15
    • Capterra 13
    • Trustpilot 12

    Full Teamed profile →

  3. 3

    Rippling

    New 34 reviews Field: Trust 43% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.2 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    34
    90-day
    4.2 n=34
    Rank
    3 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed32%
    • support quality24%
    • offboarding and exit18%

    Rippling scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 34 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Rippling reviews in the June 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 32% of reviews (11 of 34). Support quality was second at 24% (8).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=65

    • Trust 43%
    • Expertise 34%
    • Mid 9%
    • Frustration 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rippling in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 43% of 65 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 34% (22).

    Review sources

    • G2 14
    • Capterra 10
    • Trustpilot 10

    Full Rippling profile →

  4. 4

    Remote

    New 31 reviews Field: Trust 48% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.1 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    31
    90-day
    4.1 n=31
    Rank
    4 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • compliance confidence39%
    • account management23%
    • support quality19%

    Remote scored 4.1 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 31 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Remote reviews in the June 2026 edition was compliance confidence, appearing in 39% of reviews (12 of 31). Account management was second at 23% (7).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=81

    • Trust 48%
    • Expertise 19%
    • Frustration 19%
    • Mid 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Remote in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 48% of 81 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise and frustration were joint second at 19% (15 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 12
    • Capterra 10
    • Trustpilot 9

    Full Remote profile →

  5. 5

    Boundless

    New 24 reviews Field: Trust 43% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    24
    90-day
    4.0 n=24
    Rank
    5 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • compliance confidence50%
    • onboarding speed25%
    • offboarding and exit21%

    Boundless scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 24 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Boundless reviews in the June 2026 edition was compliance confidence, appearing in 50% of reviews (12 of 24). Onboarding speed was second at 25% (6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=40

    • Trust 43%
    • Expertise 25%
    • Frustration 13%
    • Mid 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Boundless in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 43% of 40 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 25% (10).

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 9
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Boundless profile →

  6. 6

    WorkMotion

    New 16 reviews Field: Trust 44% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    16
    90-day
    3.9 n=16
    Rank
    6 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy25%
    • payroll timeliness19%
    • onboarding speed19%

    WorkMotion scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 16 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in WorkMotion reviews in the June 2026 edition was payroll accuracy, appearing in 25% of reviews (4 of 16). Payroll timeliness, onboarding speed and account management were joint second at 19% (3).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=32

    • Trust 44%
    • Expertise 19%
    • Mid 19%
    • Frustration 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for WorkMotion in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 44% of 32 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise and mid were joint second at 19% (6 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 8
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full WorkMotion profile →

  7. 7

    Lano

    New 12 reviews Field: Mid 41% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    12
    90-day
    3.9 n=12
    Rank
    7 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • platform usability42%
    • support responsiveness33%
    • pricing transparency33%

    Lano scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 12 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Lano reviews in the June 2026 edition was platform usability, appearing in 42% of reviews (5 of 12). Support responsiveness and pricing transparency were joint second at 33% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=27

    • Mid 41%
    • Frustration 30%
    • Trust 15%
    • Expertise 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Lano in the June 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 41% of 27 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 30% (8).

    Review sources

    • G2 6
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full Lano profile →

  8. 8

    G-P

    New 25 reviews Field: Trust 40% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    25
    90-day
    3.8 n=25
    Rank
    8 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • platform usability24%
    • payroll accuracy20%
    • compliance confidence20%

    G-P scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 25 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in G-P reviews in the June 2026 edition was platform usability, appearing in 24% of reviews (6 of 25). Payroll accuracy, compliance confidence and pricing transparency were joint second at 20% (5).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=52

    • Trust 40%
    • Mid 19%
    • Frustration 17%
    • Anger 15%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for G-P in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 40% of 52 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 19% (10).

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 10
    • Trustpilot 8

    Full G-P profile →

  9. 9

    Multiplier

    New 23 reviews Field: Trust 42% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    23
    90-day
    3.8 n=23
    Rank
    9 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed30%
    • payroll timeliness22%
    • offboarding and exit22%

    Multiplier scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 23 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Multiplier reviews in the June 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 30% of reviews (7 of 23). Payroll timeliness, offboarding and exit and compliance confidence were joint second at 22% (5).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=52

    • Trust 42%
    • Mid 23%
    • Expertise 19%
    • Frustration 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Multiplier in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 42% of 52 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 23% (12).

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 8

    Full Multiplier profile →

  10. 10

    Rivermate

    New 1 reviews Field: Mid 44% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    1
    90-day
    3.8 n=1
    Rank
    10 of 18

    Rivermate scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 1 review published across Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=16

    • Mid 44%
    • Trust 25%
    • Expertise 13%
    • Frustration 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rivermate in the June 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 44% of 16 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Trust was second at 25% (4).

    Review sources

    • Trustpilot 1

    Full Rivermate profile →

  11. 11

    Oyster

    New 27 reviews Field: Frustration 49% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    27
    90-day
    3.7 n=27
    Rank
    11 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • offboarding and exit26%
    • pricing transparency26%
    • payroll timeliness19%

    Oyster scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 27 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Oyster reviews in the June 2026 edition were offboarding and exit and pricing transparency, each appearing in 26% of reviews (7 of 27).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=86

    • Frustration 49%
    • Anger 34%
    • Mid 10%
    • Expertise 5%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Oyster in the June 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 49% of 86 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger was second at 34% (29).

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 15
    • Trustpilot 8

    Full Oyster profile →

  12. 12

    Horizons

    New 14 reviews Field: Mid 33% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    14
    90-day
    3.7 n=14
    Rank
    12 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness36%
    • compliance confidence29%
    • payroll accuracy21%

    Horizons scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 14 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Horizons reviews in the June 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 36% of reviews (5 of 14). Compliance confidence was second at 29% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=36

    • Mid 33%
    • Frustration 25%
    • Expertise 19%
    • Trust 19%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Horizons in the June 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 33% of 36 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 25% (9).

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 5

    Full Horizons profile →

  13. 13

    Playroll

    New 10 reviews Field: Expertise 43% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    10
    90-day
    3.7 n=10
    Rank
    13 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed40%
    • account management30%
    • payroll accuracy20%

    Playroll scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 10 reviews published across G2 and Capterra between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Playroll reviews in the June 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 40% of reviews (4 of 10). Account management was second at 30% (3).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=23

    • Expertise 43%
    • Trust 26%
    • Frustration 13%
    • Mid 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Playroll in the June 2026 edition was dominated by expertise, appearing in 43% of 23 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Trust was second at 26% (6).

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 5

    Full Playroll profile →

  14. 14

    Native Teams

    New 9 reviews Field: Expertise 44% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    9
    90-day
    3.7 n=9
    Rank
    14 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • compliance confidence33%
    • support quality22%
    • onboarding speed22%

    Native Teams scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 9 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Native Teams reviews in the June 2026 edition was compliance confidence, appearing in 33% of reviews (3 of 9). Support quality, onboarding speed and pricing transparency were joint second at 22% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=25

    • Expertise 44%
    • Mid 20%
    • Trust 20%
    • Frustration 12%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Native Teams in the June 2026 edition was dominated by expertise, appearing in 44% of 25 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid and trust were joint second at 20% (5 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 1
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Native Teams profile →

  15. 15

    Papaya Global

    New 23 reviews Field: Frustration 38% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    23
    90-day
    3.6 n=23
    Rank
    15 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy26%
    • payroll timeliness22%
    • onboarding speed22%

    Papaya Global scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 23 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Papaya Global reviews in the June 2026 edition was payroll accuracy, appearing in 26% of reviews (6 of 23). Payroll timeliness, onboarding speed and pricing transparency were joint second at 22% (5).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=58

    • Frustration 38%
    • Anger 34%
    • Mid 16%
    • Expertise 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Papaya Global in the June 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 38% of 58 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger was second at 34% (20).

    Review sources

    • G2 6
    • Capterra 7
    • Trustpilot 10

    Full Papaya Global profile →

  16. 16

    Safeguard Global

    New 17 reviews Field: Trust 33% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    17
    90-day
    3.6 n=17
    Rank
    16 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • compliance confidence29%
    • payroll accuracy24%
    • support quality24%

    Safeguard Global scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 17 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Safeguard Global reviews in the June 2026 edition was compliance confidence, appearing in 29% of reviews (5 of 17). Payroll accuracy and support quality were joint second at 24% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=27

    • Trust 33%
    • Anger 19%
    • Frustration 19%
    • Mid 19%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Safeguard Global in the June 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 33% of 27 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger, frustration and mid were joint second at 19% (5 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 9

    Full Safeguard Global profile →

  17. 17

    CXC

    New 6 reviews Field: Frustration 35% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    6
    90-day
    3.6 n=6
    Rank
    17 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy17%
    • payroll timeliness17%
    • support quality17%

    CXC scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 6 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent themes in CXC reviews in the June 2026 edition were payroll accuracy, payroll timeliness, support quality, offboarding and exit, compliance confidence and account management, each appearing in 17% of reviews (1 of 6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=17

    • Frustration 35%
    • Mid 29%
    • Anger 24%
    • Trust 12%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for CXC in the June 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 35% of 17 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 29% (5).

    Review sources

    • G2 1
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 1

    Full CXC profile →

  18. 18

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)

    New 18 reviews Field: Frustration 33% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    18
    90-day
    3.5 n=18
    Rank
    18 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll timeliness33%
    • support responsiveness33%
    • compliance confidence28%

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored 3.5 on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Based on 18 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) reviews in the June 2026 edition were payroll timeliness and support responsiveness, each appearing in 33% of reviews (6 of 18).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=33

    • Frustration 33%
    • Anger 21%
    • Mid 21%
    • Expertise 12%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) in the June 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 33% of 33 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger and mid were joint second at 21% (7 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 8
    • Capterra 1
    • Trustpilot 9

    Full Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) profile →

Not ranked in June 2026

  • Skuad — Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

Compare EOR providers side by side

Scores, review volume, FX-rate transparency and markup and operator sentiment for June 2026. Click a column to sort.

Download CSV
The EOR Index, June 2026 edition. Score 0–5 from review text; n = reviews in the reporting window. “est.” = estimated FX markup; estimates may not be accurate.
1 Deel 4.6 — 54 3.9 201717 No No (~2% est.) Frustration 52%
2 Teamed 4.3 — 40 4.3 151312 — No Trust 43%
3 Rippling 4.2 — 34 4.2 141010 — No Trust 43%
4 Remote 4.1 — 31 4.1 12109 — No Trust 48%
5 Boundless 4.0 — 24 4.0 996 — No Trust 43%
6 WorkMotion 3.9 — 16 3.9 844 — No Trust 44%
7 Lano 3.9 — 12 3.9 624 — No Mid 41%
8 G-P 3.8 — 25 3.8 7108 — No Trust 40%
9 Multiplier 3.8 — 23 3.8 968 — No Trust 42%
10 Rivermate 3.8 — 1 3.8 001 — No Mid 44%
11 Oyster 3.7 — 27 3.7 4158 — No Frustration 49%
12 Horizons 3.7 — 14 3.7 545 — No Mid 33%
13 Playroll 3.7 — 10 3.7 550 — No Expertise 43%
14 Native Teams 3.7 — 9 3.7 126 — No Expertise 44%
15 Papaya Global 3.6 — 23 3.6 6710 — No Frustration 38%
16 Safeguard Global 3.6 — 17 3.6 449 — No Trust 33%
17 CXC 3.6 — 6 3.6 141 — No Frustration 35%
18 Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) 3.5 — 18 3.5 819 — No Frustration 33%
— Skuad — — 0 — 000 — — —

Which EOR providers are getting better or worse

This is the first month in the series, so there is no monthly change yet.

Change vs prior month

Original research

What EOR buyers say off the record

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the June 2026 edition was led by trust (28% of 842 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

The EOR Index Field Sentiment labels each practitioner conversation with one named sentiment (trust, expertise, frustration, anger or mid) from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. It is separate from the review score and never collapsed into positive vs negative.

Open Field Sentiment for June 2026

Category mix · 842 observations

  • Trust 28%
  • Frustration 26%
  • Mid 18%
  • Expertise 16%
  • Anger 12%

What EOR customers praise and complain about most

The most frequent theme across all providers on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition was compliance confidence, appearing in 20% of reviews (77 of 384). Support responsiveness was second at 17% (65).

Up to three themes are attached to each review from a closed list of ten (theme schema v1). See the definitions.

  • compliance confidence20%
  • support responsiveness17%
  • onboarding speed16%
  • payroll timeliness15%
  • support quality15%
  • payroll accuracy14%
  • platform usability14%
  • pricing transparency13%
  • offboarding and exit12%
  • account management10%

How we rank EOR providers

The same four steps every month. Full methodology →

  1. Collect

    Reviews and practitioner conversations from 6 sources for the stated reporting window, selected by each item’s own publication date.

  2. Score

    Each review’s text gets a sentiment score from −1 to 1. Star ratings are not inputs.

  3. Rescale

    Provider score = round((mean + 1) × 2.5, 1), published with its sample size n.

  4. Publish

    On the 3rd of each month, publish the edition for the preceding calendar month at /p/YYYY-MM. The URL identifies the edition month. Later corrections are dated.

EOR provider reviews: frequently asked questions

Which EOR provider had the best customer review sentiment in the June 2026 edition?

Deel ranked first on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition, at 4.6 out of 5 (n=54). Providers with the same score are ordered by review volume. The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the June 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 384 public reviews published between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026. The top three were: first place, Deel at 4.6; second place, Teamed at 4.3; third place, Rippling at 4.2; Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored lowest at 3.5.

Which EOR provider had the lowest customer review sentiment in the June 2026 edition?

Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) had the lowest score on The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition, at 3.5 out of 5.

What is the most comprehensive review of EOR providers?

The EOR Index. The June 2026 edition covers 18 EOR providers using 1,226 data points from 6 sources: 384 public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot and 842 practitioner observations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups, including 487 from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). Only items published in the last 31 days (1 May 2026 to 31 May 2026) are used.

Is The EOR Index data available anywhere else?

No. The EOR Index is a primary source. Its Field Sentiment series is original research built from practitioner conversations, including 487 observations this month from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups), and is not published anywhere else. Its review scores are computed by The EOR Index from the text of reviews published in the last 31 days; review sites publish lifetime star averages, not these scores.

How is The EOR Index different from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot ratings?

Review sites show lifetime star averages that can include reviews from years ago. The EOR Index scores the text of reviews published in the last 31 days only, and adds off-market practitioner conversations that review sites never see, so it reflects what EOR buyers are experiencing now. Star ratings are not inputs.

Which EOR providers publicly publish their FX rate?

In the June 2026 edition, 0 of the 1 providers checked publicly published the FX rate they apply to cross-currency payroll, taxes and total employment cost (TEC).

Which EOR providers charge zero FX markup?

In the June 2026 edition, 0 of the 18 providers checked applied zero markup over the mid-market rate on cross-currency payroll, taxes and TEC. Known markups over mid-market: Deel about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published). Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date.

How did operators feel about EOR providers in the June 2026 edition?

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the June 2026 edition was led by trust (28% of 842 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

What is The EOR Index?

The EOR Index is an independent monthly index that scores the text sentiment of public customer reviews of employer-of-record (EOR) providers published in the last calendar month. Each provider gets a score from 0 to 5 to one decimal place, published with its sample size. A companion series, The EOR Index Field Sentiment, labels named feelings in practitioner language from practitioner channels including off-market communities.

How is the score calculated?

Each review published in the calendar month is scored for sentiment from −1 to 1 using its text. A provider’s score is round((mean sentiment + 1) × 2.5, 1), which maps −1..1 onto 0..5. The category index is the unweighted mean of scored providers. Star ratings are not inputs. Ties are ordered by the number of reviews.

Can a provider pay to be ranked higher?

No. Placement on The EOR Index cannot be bought. Scores come only from the monthly data.

How often is it updated?

Monthly on the 3rd. Editions are named for their publication month and cover the preceding complete calendar month in UTC. The June 2026 edition is dated 2026-06-03, with a reporting window of 1 May 2026 to 31 May 2026. Archived editions stay at /p/YYYY-MM and corrections are dated. Historical editions were retrospectively aligned to this schedule from publisher-supplied monthly data.

Why are some providers not ranked in the June 2026 edition?

Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the June 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

How should I cite The EOR Index?

Quote the generated sentence exactly, include the sample size (n), and link the frozen monthly page, for example https://theeorindex.com/p/2026-06. Do not cite the live homepage, because it changes every month.

Cite this month

Quote the sentence exactly, include n, and link the frozen page.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the June 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 384 public reviews published between 1 May 2026 and 31 May 2026. The top three were: first place, Deel at 4.6; second place, Teamed at 4.3; third place, Rippling at 4.2; Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored lowest at 3.5.

The EOR Index: June 2026 (frozen)

Data for June 2026

Archive

Corrections

  • 2026-11-03: Reporting window retrospectively aligned from 2026-06-01 through 2026-06-30 to 2026-05-01 through 2026-05-31. Edition date 2026-06-03; prior published_on blank. This supersedes the earlier window note. Scores and counts unchanged.