Frozen snapshot 1 September 2026 – 30 September 2026 Edition 3 October 2026

The world’s most comprehensive EOR review dataOriginal data, not available anywhere else

The EOR Index: October 2026

October 2026 edition. Reporting window: 1 September 2026 – 30 September 2026. Built on 437 public reviews and 880 practitioner observations, 519 of them off-market, across 18 EOR providers.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 437 public reviews published between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.6; second place, Rippling at 4.5; third place, Deel at 4.3; Papaya Global scored lowest at 3.4.

3.9 / 5

Category index · 0.0

437

Public reviews

18

Providers scored

Trust

Dominant field affect · 32%

Why this is the most comprehensive EOR review

1,317

The most comprehensive EOR review

18 EOR providers, 6 data sources and 1,317 data points in the October 2026 edition: public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot, plus practitioner conversations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

519

The only EOR review with off-market, proprietary data

519 observations this month came from Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups: conversations between People Ops and global employment operators that public review sites never see. This data is not available anywhere else.

30 days

Current monthly EOR review scores

Every score uses only reviews and conversations published 1 September 2026 – 30 September 2026. Lifetime star averages can be years old; this is a real snapshot of what buyers are experiencing now.

Best EOR providers in October 2026, ranked

18 providers with at least one public review in this edition’s reporting window, ordered by score (ties by number of reviews). Each card shows the citable sentence, what reviewers wrote about, and how operators feel.

Sort by
  1. Highest public-review sentiment · October 2026
    1

    Teamed

    +0.1 67 reviews Field: Trust 57% FX rate public Zero FX markup
    Score
    4.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    67
    90-day
    4.5 n=181
    Rank
    1 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality27%
    • support responsiveness24%
    • payroll accuracy22%

    Teamed scored 4.6 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the September 2026 edition. Based on 67 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Teamed reviews in the October 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 27% of reviews (18 of 67). Support responsiveness was second at 24% (16).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=105

    • Trust 57%
    • Expertise 30%
    • Mid 7%
    • Frustration 5%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Teamed in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 57% of 105 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 30% (32). Trust share is up 3 percentage points from the September 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 25
    • Capterra 22
    • Trustpilot 20

    Full Teamed profile →

  2. 2

    Rippling

    0.0 32 reviews Field: Trust 46% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    32
    90-day
    4.4 n=110
    Rank
    2 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy28%
    • onboarding speed25%
    • compliance confidence19%

    Rippling scored 4.5 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 32 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Rippling reviews in the October 2026 edition was payroll accuracy, appearing in 28% of reviews (9 of 32). Onboarding speed was second at 25% (8).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=65

    • Trust 46%
    • Expertise 34%
    • Frustration 9%
    • Mid 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rippling in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 46% of 65 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 34% (22).

    Review sources

    • G2 8
    • Capterra 13
    • Trustpilot 11

    Full Rippling profile →

  3. 3

    Deel

    0.0 47 reviews Field: Frustration 54% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.3 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    47
    90-day
    4.0 n=160
    Rank
    3 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness26%
    • onboarding speed23%
    • payroll timeliness19%

    Deel scored 4.3 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 47 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Deel reviews in the October 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 26% of reviews (12 of 47). Onboarding speed was second at 23% (11).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=89

    • Frustration 54%
    • Mid 25%
    • Trust 13%
    • Expertise 4%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Deel in the October 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 54% of 89 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 25% (22).

    Review sources

    • G2 14
    • Capterra 18
    • Trustpilot 15

    Full Deel profile →

  4. 4

    Multiplier

    0.0 21 reviews Field: Trust 40% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.2 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    21
    90-day
    4.1 n=70
    Rank
    4 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality24%
    • pricing transparency24%
    • payroll timeliness19%

    Multiplier scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 21 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Multiplier reviews in the October 2026 edition were support quality and pricing transparency, each appearing in 24% of reviews (5 of 21).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=58

    • Trust 40%
    • Expertise 28%
    • Mid 17%
    • Frustration 12%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Multiplier in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 40% of 58 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 28% (16).

    Review sources

    • G2 8
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 9

    Full Multiplier profile →

  5. 5

    Boundless

    0.0 19 reviews Field: Trust 43% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    19
    90-day
    4.0 n=45
    Rank
    5 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed26%
    • compliance confidence21%
    • payroll accuracy16%

    Boundless scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 19 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Boundless reviews in the October 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 26% of reviews (5 of 19). Compliance confidence was second at 21% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=42

    • Trust 43%
    • Expertise 29%
    • Mid 14%
    • Frustration 12%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Boundless in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 43% of 42 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 29% (12).

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 9
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Boundless profile →

  6. 6

    Remote

    0.0 57 reviews Field: Trust 56% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    57
    90-day
    3.8 n=175
    Rank
    6 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality28%
    • account management23%
    • payroll accuracy19%

    Remote scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 57 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Remote reviews in the October 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 28% of reviews (16 of 57). Account management was second at 23% (13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=81

    • Trust 56%
    • Expertise 15%
    • Frustration 15%
    • Mid 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Remote in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 56% of 81 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise and frustration were joint second at 15% (12 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 13
    • Capterra 25
    • Trustpilot 19

    Full Remote profile →

  7. 7

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)

    0.0 19 reviews Field: Frustration 41% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    19
    90-day
    3.7 n=48
    Rank
    7 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll timeliness21%
    • platform usability21%
    • account management21%

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 19 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) reviews in the October 2026 edition were payroll timeliness, platform usability and account management, each appearing in 21% of reviews (4 of 19).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=39

    • Frustration 41%
    • Mid 28%
    • Anger 13%
    • Trust 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) in the October 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 41% of 39 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 28% (11).

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 8

    Full Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) profile →

  8. 8

    WorkMotion

    0.0 14 reviews Field: Trust 46% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    14
    90-day
    3.9 n=38
    Rank
    8 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality21%
    • onboarding speed21%
    • payroll accuracy14%

    WorkMotion scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 14 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in WorkMotion reviews in the October 2026 edition were support quality and onboarding speed, each appearing in 21% of reviews (3 of 14).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=35

    • Trust 46%
    • Expertise 23%
    • Mid 14%
    • Anger 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for WorkMotion in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 46% of 35 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 23% (8).

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full WorkMotion profile →

  9. 9

    Playroll

    0.0 12 reviews Field: Trust 43% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    12
    90-day
    3.8 n=32
    Rank
    9 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness25%
    • compliance confidence25%
    • platform usability25%

    Playroll scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 12 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Playroll reviews in the October 2026 edition were support responsiveness, compliance confidence and platform usability, each appearing in 25% of reviews (3 of 12).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=23

    • Trust 43%
    • Expertise 30%
    • Mid 13%
    • Frustration 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Playroll in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 43% of 23 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 30% (7).

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full Playroll profile →

  10. 10

    Oyster

    0.0 33 reviews Field: Anger 45% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    33
    90-day
    3.6 n=90
    Rank
    10 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed21%
    • pricing transparency18%
    • account management18%

    Oyster scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 33 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Oyster reviews in the October 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 21% of reviews (7 of 33). Pricing transparency and account management were joint second at 18% (6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=80

    • Anger 45%
    • Frustration 41%
    • Expertise 5%
    • Mid 5%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Oyster in the October 2026 edition was dominated by anger, appearing in 45% of 80 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 41% (33).

    Review sources

    • G2 12
    • Capterra 14
    • Trustpilot 7

    Full Oyster profile →

  11. 11

    G-P

    0.0 31 reviews Field: Trust 38% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    31
    90-day
    3.8 n=110
    Rank
    11 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency23%
    • support quality19%
    • compliance confidence19%

    G-P scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 31 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in G-P reviews in the October 2026 edition was pricing transparency, appearing in 23% of reviews (7 of 31). Support quality and compliance confidence were joint second at 19% (6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=63

    • Trust 38%
    • Frustration 21%
    • Mid 19%
    • Anger 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for G-P in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 38% of 63 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 21% (13).

    Review sources

    • G2 10
    • Capterra 12
    • Trustpilot 9

    Full G-P profile →

  12. 12

    Horizons

    0.0 10 reviews Field: Mid 27% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    10
    90-day
    3.7 n=26
    Rank
    12 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy30%
    • onboarding speed30%
    • payroll timeliness20%

    Horizons scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 10 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Horizons reviews in the October 2026 edition were payroll accuracy and onboarding speed, each appearing in 30% of reviews (3 of 10).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=37

    • Mid 27%
    • Expertise 24%
    • Frustration 24%
    • Trust 19%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Horizons in the October 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 27% of 37 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise and frustration were joint second at 24% (9 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Horizons profile →

  13. 13

    Rivermate

    New 7 reviews Field: Mid 29% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    7
    90-day
    3.9 n=15
    Rank
    13 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy29%
    • support quality29%
    • payroll timeliness14%

    Rivermate scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition. Based on 7 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Rivermate reviews in the October 2026 edition were payroll accuracy and support quality, each appearing in 29% of reviews (2 of 7).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=17

    • Mid 29%
    • Expertise 24%
    • Trust 24%
    • Frustration 18%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rivermate in the October 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 29% of 17 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise and trust were joint second at 24% (4 each). Mid share is down 7 percentage points from the September 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 2

    Full Rivermate profile →

  14. 14

    Lano

    0.0 16 reviews Field: Mid 43% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    16
    90-day
    3.8 n=42
    Rank
    14 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness25%
    • payroll accuracy19%
    • support quality19%

    Lano scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 16 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Lano reviews in the October 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 25% of reviews (4 of 16). Payroll accuracy, support quality, pricing transparency and platform usability were joint second at 19% (3).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=28

    • Mid 43%
    • Trust 25%
    • Frustration 18%
    • Anger 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Lano in the October 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 43% of 28 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Trust was second at 25% (7). Mid share is down 3 percentage points from the September 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 5

    Full Lano profile →

  15. 15

    Native Teams

    0.0 8 reviews Field: Expertise 43% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    8
    90-day
    3.7 n=25
    Rank
    15 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll timeliness25%
    • support responsiveness25%
    • onboarding speed25%

    Native Teams scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 8 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Native Teams reviews in the October 2026 edition were payroll timeliness, support responsiveness and onboarding speed, each appearing in 25% of reviews (2 of 8).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=21

    • Expertise 43%
    • Trust 24%
    • Frustration 14%
    • Mid 14%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Native Teams in the October 2026 edition was dominated by expertise, appearing in 43% of 21 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Trust was second at 24% (5).

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 2

    Full Native Teams profile →

  16. 16

    Safeguard Global

    0.0 13 reviews Field: Trust 37% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    13
    90-day
    3.6 n=39
    Rank
    16 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality23%
    • compliance confidence23%
    • pricing transparency23%

    Safeguard Global scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 13 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Safeguard Global reviews in the October 2026 edition were support quality, compliance confidence and pricing transparency, each appearing in 23% of reviews (3 of 13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=27

    • Trust 37%
    • Anger 22%
    • Mid 22%
    • Frustration 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Safeguard Global in the October 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 37% of 27 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger and mid were joint second at 22% (6 each).

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 5
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full Safeguard Global profile →

  17. 17

    CXC

    0.0 6 reviews Field: Anger / Frustration / Mid 25% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    6
    90-day
    3.6 n=18
    Rank
    17 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy33%
    • payroll timeliness33%
    • support responsiveness33%

    CXC scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 6 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent themes in CXC reviews in the October 2026 edition were payroll accuracy, payroll timeliness and support responsiveness, each appearing in 33% of reviews (2 of 6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=16

    • Anger 25%
    • Frustration 25%
    • Mid 25%
    • Expertise 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for CXC in the October 2026 edition was led jointly by anger, frustration and mid, each appearing in 25% of 16 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 2

    Full CXC profile →

  18. 18

    Papaya Global

    0.0 25 reviews Field: Anger 46% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    3.4 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    25
    90-day
    3.3 n=75
    Rank
    18 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency28%
    • payroll timeliness24%
    • compliance confidence20%

    Papaya Global scored 3.4 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. Based on 25 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Papaya Global reviews in the October 2026 edition was pricing transparency, appearing in 28% of reviews (7 of 25). Payroll timeliness was second at 24% (6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=54

    • Anger 46%
    • Frustration 30%
    • Mid 11%
    • Expertise 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Papaya Global in the October 2026 edition was dominated by anger, appearing in 46% of 54 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 30% (16). Anger share is down 3 percentage points from the September 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 11
    • Trustpilot 7

    Full Papaya Global profile →

Not ranked in October 2026

  • Skuad — Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

Compare EOR providers side by side

Scores, review volume, FX-rate transparency and markup and operator sentiment for October 2026. Click a column to sort.

Download CSV
The EOR Index, October 2026 edition. Score 0–5 from review text; n = reviews in the reporting window. “est.” = estimated FX markup; estimates may not be accurate.
1 Teamed 4.6 +0.1 67 4.5 252220 Yes Yes Trust 57%
2 Rippling 4.5 0.0 32 4.4 81311 No No (~2% est.) Trust 46%
3 Deel 4.3 0.0 47 4.0 141815 No No (~2% est.) Frustration 54%
4 Multiplier 4.2 0.0 21 4.1 849 No No (~2% est.) Trust 40%
5 Boundless 4.0 0.0 19 4.0 793 No No (~2% est.) Trust 43%
6 Remote 3.9 0.0 57 3.8 132519 No No (~2% est.) Trust 56%
7 Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) 3.9 0.0 19 3.7 748 No No (~2% est.) Frustration 41%
8 WorkMotion 3.9 0.0 14 3.9 563 No No (~2% est.) Trust 46%
9 Playroll 3.9 0.0 12 3.8 534 No No (~2% est.) Trust 43%
10 Oyster 3.8 0.0 33 3.6 12147 No No (~2% est.) Anger 45%
11 G-P 3.8 0.0 31 3.8 10129 No No (~2% est.) Trust 38%
12 Horizons 3.8 0.0 10 3.7 433 No No (~2% est.) Mid 27%
13 Rivermate 3.8 — 7 3.9 232 No No (~2% est.) Mid 29%
14 Lano 3.7 0.0 16 3.8 565 No No (~2% est.) Mid 43%
15 Native Teams 3.7 0.0 8 3.7 332 No No (~2% est.) Expertise 43%
16 Safeguard Global 3.6 0.0 13 3.6 454 No No (~2% est.) Trust 37%
17 CXC 3.6 0.0 6 3.6 222 No No (~2% est.) Anger / Frustration / Mid 25%
18 Papaya Global 3.4 0.0 25 3.3 7117 No No (~2% est.) Anger 46%
— Skuad — — 0 — 000 — — —

Which EOR providers are getting better or worse

  • Teamed scored 4.6 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, the largest monthly rise of any provider tracked. Based on 67 reviews.
  • Teamed scored 4.6 on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, its highest score since the June 2026 edition. Based on 67 reviews.

Change vs September 2026

Original research

What EOR buyers say off the record

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the October 2026 edition was led by trust (32% of 880 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

The EOR Index Field Sentiment labels each practitioner conversation with one named sentiment (trust, expertise, frustration, anger or mid) from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. It is separate from the review score and never collapsed into positive vs negative.

Open Field Sentiment for October 2026

Category mix · 880 observations

  • Trust 32%
  • Frustration 22%
  • Expertise 18%
  • Mid 16%
  • Anger 12%

What EOR customers praise and complain about most

The most frequent theme across all providers on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 20% of reviews (86 of 437). Payroll accuracy was second at 18% (79).

Up to three themes are attached to each review from a closed list of ten (theme schema v1). See the definitions.

  • support quality20%
  • payroll accuracy18%
  • compliance confidence18%
  • onboarding speed17%
  • support responsiveness17%
  • pricing transparency16%
  • payroll timeliness16%
  • account management15%
  • platform usability15%
  • offboarding and exit11%

How we rank EOR providers

The same four steps every month. Full methodology →

  1. Collect

    Reviews and practitioner conversations from 6 sources for the stated reporting window, selected by each item’s own publication date.

  2. Score

    Each review’s text gets a sentiment score from −1 to 1. Star ratings are not inputs.

  3. Rescale

    Provider score = round((mean + 1) × 2.5, 1), published with its sample size n.

  4. Publish

    On the 3rd of each month, publish the edition for the preceding calendar month at /p/YYYY-MM. The URL identifies the edition month. Later corrections are dated.

EOR provider reviews: frequently asked questions

Which EOR provider had the best customer review sentiment in the October 2026 edition?

Teamed ranked first on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, at 4.6 out of 5 (n=67). Providers with the same score are ordered by review volume. The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 437 public reviews published between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.6; second place, Rippling at 4.5; third place, Deel at 4.3; Papaya Global scored lowest at 3.4.

Which EOR provider had the lowest customer review sentiment in the October 2026 edition?

Papaya Global had the lowest score on The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition, at 3.4 out of 5.

Which EOR providers moved most in the October 2026 edition?

Largest rise: Teamed (+0.1). Change is this month’s published score minus last month’s published score.

What is the most comprehensive review of EOR providers?

The EOR Index. The October 2026 edition covers 18 EOR providers using 1,317 data points from 6 sources: 437 public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot and 880 practitioner observations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups, including 519 from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). Only items published in the last 30 days (1 September 2026 to 30 September 2026) are used.

Is The EOR Index data available anywhere else?

No. The EOR Index is a primary source. Its Field Sentiment series is original research built from practitioner conversations, including 519 observations this month from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups), and is not published anywhere else. Its review scores are computed by The EOR Index from the text of reviews published in the last 30 days; review sites publish lifetime star averages, not these scores.

How is The EOR Index different from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot ratings?

Review sites show lifetime star averages that can include reviews from years ago. The EOR Index scores the text of reviews published in the last 30 days only, and adds off-market practitioner conversations that review sites never see, so it reflects what EOR buyers are experiencing now. Star ratings are not inputs.

Which EOR providers publicly publish their FX rate?

In the October 2026 edition, 1 of the 18 providers checked publicly published the FX rate they apply to cross-currency payroll, taxes and total employment cost (TEC): Teamed.

Which EOR providers charge zero FX markup?

In the October 2026 edition, 1 of the 18 providers checked applied zero markup over the mid-market rate on cross-currency payroll, taxes and TEC: Teamed. Known markups over mid-market: Rippling about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Deel about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Multiplier about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Boundless about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Remote about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); WorkMotion about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Playroll about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Oyster about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); G-P about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Horizons about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Rivermate about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Lano about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Native Teams about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Safeguard Global about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); CXC about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Papaya Global about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published). Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date.

How did operators feel about EOR providers in the October 2026 edition?

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the October 2026 edition was led by trust (32% of 880 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

What is The EOR Index?

The EOR Index is an independent monthly index that scores the text sentiment of public customer reviews of employer-of-record (EOR) providers published in the last calendar month. Each provider gets a score from 0 to 5 to one decimal place, published with its sample size. A companion series, The EOR Index Field Sentiment, labels named feelings in practitioner language from practitioner channels including off-market communities.

How is the score calculated?

Each review published in the calendar month is scored for sentiment from −1 to 1 using its text. A provider’s score is round((mean sentiment + 1) × 2.5, 1), which maps −1..1 onto 0..5. The category index is the unweighted mean of scored providers. Star ratings are not inputs. Ties are ordered by the number of reviews.

Can a provider pay to be ranked higher?

No. Placement on The EOR Index cannot be bought. Scores come only from the monthly data.

How often is it updated?

Monthly on the 3rd. Editions are named for their publication month and cover the preceding complete calendar month in UTC. The October 2026 edition is dated 2026-10-03, with a reporting window of 1 September 2026 to 30 September 2026. Archived editions stay at /p/YYYY-MM and corrections are dated. Historical editions were retrospectively aligned to this schedule from publisher-supplied monthly data.

Why are some providers not ranked in the October 2026 edition?

Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the October 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

How should I cite The EOR Index?

Quote the generated sentence exactly, include the sample size (n), and link the frozen monthly page, for example https://theeorindex.com/p/2026-10. Do not cite the live homepage, because it changes every month.

Cite this month

Quote the sentence exactly, include n, and link the frozen page.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the October 2026 edition, unchanged from the September 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 437 public reviews published between 1 September 2026 and 30 September 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.6; second place, Rippling at 4.5; third place, Deel at 4.3; Papaya Global scored lowest at 3.4.

The EOR Index: October 2026 (frozen)

Data for October 2026

Archive

Corrections

  • 2026-11-03: Reporting window retrospectively aligned from 2026-10-01 through 2026-10-31 to 2026-09-01 through 2026-09-30. Edition date 2026-10-03; prior published_on blank. This supersedes the earlier window note. Scores and counts unchanged.