Frozen snapshot 1 June 2026 – 30 June 2026 Edition 3 July 2026

The world’s most comprehensive EOR review dataOriginal data, not available anywhere else

The EOR Index: July 2026

July 2026 edition. Reporting window: 1 June 2026 – 30 June 2026. Built on 396 public reviews and 874 practitioner observations, 501 of them off-market, across 18 EOR providers.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the July 2026 edition, unchanged from the June 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 396 public reviews published between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.4; second place, Rippling at 4.3; third place, Rivermate at 4.2; Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for lowest at 3.5.

3.9 / 5

Category index · 0.0

396

Public reviews

18

Providers scored

Trust

Dominant field affect · 28%

Why this is the most comprehensive EOR review

1,270

The most comprehensive EOR review

18 EOR providers, 6 data sources and 1,270 data points in the July 2026 edition: public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot, plus practitioner conversations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

501

The only EOR review with off-market, proprietary data

501 observations this month came from Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups: conversations between People Ops and global employment operators that public review sites never see. This data is not available anywhere else.

30 days

Current monthly EOR review scores

Every score uses only reviews and conversations published 1 June 2026 – 30 June 2026. Lifetime star averages can be years old; this is a real snapshot of what buyers are experiencing now.

Best EOR providers in July 2026, ranked

18 providers with at least one public review in this edition’s reporting window, ordered by score (ties by number of reviews). Each card shows the citable sentence, what reviewers wrote about, and how operators feel.

Sort by
  1. Highest public-review sentiment · July 2026
    1

    Teamed

    +0.1 47 reviews Field: Trust 47% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.4 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    47
    90-day
    4.4 n=87
    Rank
    1 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality23%
    • support responsiveness21%
    • payroll accuracy19%

    Teamed scored 4.4 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 47 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Teamed reviews in the July 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 23% of reviews (11 of 47). Support responsiveness was second at 21% (10).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=75

    • Trust 47%
    • Expertise 27%
    • Mid 13%
    • Frustration 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Teamed in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 47% of 75 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 27% (20). Trust share is up 4 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 17
    • Capterra 16
    • Trustpilot 14

    Full Teamed profile →

  2. 2

    Rippling

    +0.1 41 reviews Field: Trust 41% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.3 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    41
    90-day
    4.3 n=75
    Rank
    2 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • platform usability29%
    • payroll accuracy24%
    • onboarding speed17%

    Rippling scored 4.3 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 41 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Rippling reviews in the July 2026 edition was platform usability, appearing in 29% of reviews (12 of 41). Payroll accuracy was second at 24% (10).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=73

    • Trust 41%
    • Expertise 29%
    • Mid 12%
    • Frustration 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rippling in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 41% of 73 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 29% (21).

    Review sources

    • G2 19
    • Capterra 9
    • Trustpilot 13

    Full Rippling profile →

  3. 3

    Rivermate

    +0.4 2 reviews Field: Mid 42% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.2 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    2
    90-day
    4.1 n=3
    Rank
    3 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy50%
    • support responsiveness50%
    • onboarding speed50%

    Rivermate scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.4 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 2 reviews published across G2 and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Rivermate reviews in the July 2026 edition were payroll accuracy, support responsiveness, onboarding speed and offboarding and exit, each appearing in 50% of reviews (1 of 2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=12

    • Mid 42%
    • Expertise 33%
    • Trust 17%
    • Anger 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rivermate in the July 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 42% of 12 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 33% (4).

    Review sources

    • G2 1
    • Trustpilot 1

    Full Rivermate profile →

  4. 4

    Deel

    -0.6 47 reviews Field: Frustration 51% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    47
    90-day
    4.0 n=101
    Rank
    4 of 18

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • platform usability32%
    • support responsiveness28%
    • support quality15%

    Deel scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, down 0.6 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 47 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Deel reviews in the July 2026 edition was platform usability, appearing in 32% of reviews (15 of 47). Support responsiveness was second at 28% (13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=108

    • Frustration 51%
    • Mid 21%
    • Trust 17%
    • Expertise 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Deel in the July 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 51% of 108 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 21% (23).

    Review sources

    • G2 14
    • Capterra 18
    • Trustpilot 15

    Full Deel profile →

  5. 5

    Boundless

    0.0 13 reviews Field: Trust 42% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    13
    90-day
    4.0 n=37
    Rank
    5 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy23%
    • onboarding speed23%
    • offboarding and exit23%

    Boundless scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, unchanged from the June 2026 edition. Based on 13 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Boundless reviews in the July 2026 edition were payroll accuracy, onboarding speed and offboarding and exit, each appearing in 23% of reviews (3 of 13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=50

    • Trust 42%
    • Expertise 30%
    • Mid 12%
    • Frustration 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Boundless in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 42% of 50 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 30% (15).

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 1
    • Trustpilot 5

    Full Boundless profile →

  6. 6

    WorkMotion

    +0.1 13 reviews Field: Trust 47% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    13
    90-day
    3.9 n=29
    Rank
    6 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed31%
    • compliance confidence31%
    • payroll accuracy23%

    WorkMotion scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 13 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent themes in WorkMotion reviews in the July 2026 edition were onboarding speed and compliance confidence, each appearing in 31% of reviews (4 of 13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=30

    • Trust 47%
    • Expertise 20%
    • Mid 17%
    • Anger 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for WorkMotion in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 47% of 30 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 20% (6). Trust share is up 3 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 5
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full WorkMotion profile →

  7. 7

    Multiplier

    +0.1 16 reviews Field: Trust 40% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    16
    90-day
    3.9 n=39
    Rank
    7 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency31%
    • compliance confidence25%
    • support quality19%

    Multiplier scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 16 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Multiplier reviews in the July 2026 edition was pricing transparency, appearing in 31% of reviews (5 of 16). Compliance confidence was second at 25% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=45

    • Trust 40%
    • Mid 24%
    • Expertise 20%
    • Frustration 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Multiplier in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 40% of 45 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 24% (11).

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 8
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Multiplier profile →

  8. 8

    Native Teams

    +0.2 9 reviews Field: Expertise 35% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    9
    90-day
    3.8 n=18
    Rank
    8 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality33%
    • offboarding and exit33%
    • pricing transparency33%

    Native Teams scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.2 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 9 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Native Teams reviews in the July 2026 edition were support quality, offboarding and exit, pricing transparency and account management, each appearing in 33% of reviews (3 of 9).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=20

    • Expertise 35%
    • Mid 25%
    • Trust 25%
    • Frustration 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Native Teams in the July 2026 edition was dominated by expertise, appearing in 35% of 20 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid and trust were joint second at 25% (5 each). Expertise share is down 9 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Native Teams profile →

  9. 9

    Playroll

    +0.2 9 reviews Field: Expertise / Trust 33% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    9
    90-day
    3.8 n=19
    Rank
    9 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency33%
    • support responsiveness22%
    • compliance confidence22%

    Playroll scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.2 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 9 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Playroll reviews in the July 2026 edition was pricing transparency, appearing in 33% of reviews (3 of 9). Support responsiveness, compliance confidence and platform usability were joint second at 22% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=24

    • Expertise 33%
    • Trust 33%
    • Anger 13%
    • Frustration 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Playroll in the July 2026 edition was led jointly by expertise and trust, each appearing in 33% of 24 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 1
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Playroll profile →

  10. 10

    Oyster

    +0.1 28 reviews Field: Frustration 48% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    28
    90-day
    3.8 n=55
    Rank
    10 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness25%
    • offboarding and exit25%
    • compliance confidence21%

    Oyster scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 28 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Oyster reviews in the July 2026 edition were support responsiveness and offboarding and exit, each appearing in 25% of reviews (7 of 28).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=85

    • Frustration 48%
    • Anger 32%
    • Mid 8%
    • Expertise 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Oyster in the July 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 48% of 85 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger was second at 32% (27).

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 10
    • Trustpilot 9

    Full Oyster profile →

  11. 11

    Lano

    -0.1 11 reviews Field: Mid 42% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    11
    90-day
    3.8 n=23
    Rank
    11 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed27%
    • pricing transparency27%
    • support responsiveness9%

    Lano scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, down 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 11 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Lano reviews in the July 2026 edition were onboarding speed and pricing transparency, each appearing in 27% of reviews (3 of 11).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=26

    • Mid 42%
    • Frustration 23%
    • Trust 19%
    • Anger 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Lano in the July 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 42% of 26 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 23% (6).

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Lano profile →

  12. 12

    Horizons

    +0.1 10 reviews Field: Mid 32% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    10
    90-day
    3.8 n=24
    Rank
    12 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed30%
    • payroll accuracy20%
    • support responsiveness20%

    Horizons scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 10 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Horizons reviews in the July 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 30% of reviews (3 of 10). Payroll accuracy, support responsiveness, offboarding and exit and pricing transparency were joint second at 20% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=28

    • Mid 32%
    • Frustration 29%
    • Trust 25%
    • Anger 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Horizons in the July 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 32% of 28 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 29% (8).

    Review sources

    • G2 1
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Horizons profile →

  13. 13

    G-P

    -0.1 35 reviews Field: Trust 44% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    35
    90-day
    3.7 n=60
    Rank
    13 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • account management34%
    • pricing transparency23%
    • compliance confidence20%

    G-P scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, down 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 35 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in G-P reviews in the July 2026 edition was account management, appearing in 34% of reviews (12 of 35). Pricing transparency was second at 23% (8).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=61

    • Trust 44%
    • Mid 20%
    • Frustration 18%
    • Anger 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for G-P in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 44% of 61 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 20% (12). Trust share is up 4 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 14
    • Trustpilot 12

    Full G-P profile →

  14. 14

    Remote

    -0.5 61 reviews Field: Trust 39% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    61
    90-day
    3.8 n=92
    Rank
    14 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality34%
    • account management25%
    • compliance confidence21%

    Remote scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, down 0.5 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 61 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Remote reviews in the July 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 34% of reviews (21 of 61). Account management was second at 25% (15).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=87

    • Trust 39%
    • Frustration 32%
    • Expertise 16%
    • Mid 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Remote in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 39% of 87 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 32% (28). Trust share is down 9 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 15
    • Capterra 22
    • Trustpilot 24

    Full Remote profile →

  15. 15

    Safeguard Global

    0.0 10 reviews Field: Trust 36% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    10
    90-day
    3.6 n=27
    Rank
    15 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality40%
    • onboarding speed20%
    • offboarding and exit20%

    Safeguard Global scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, unchanged from the June 2026 edition. Based on 10 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Safeguard Global reviews in the July 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 40% of reviews (4 of 10). Onboarding speed, offboarding and exit and account management were joint second at 20% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=33

    • Trust 36%
    • Mid 24%
    • Anger 21%
    • Frustration 15%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Safeguard Global in the July 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 36% of 33 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 24% (8). Trust share is up 3 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 5

    Full Safeguard Global profile →

  16. 16

    Papaya Global

    -0.1 22 reviews Field: Anger 37% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    22
    90-day
    3.6 n=45
    Rank
    16 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy32%
    • payroll timeliness23%
    • onboarding speed23%

    Papaya Global scored 3.5 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, down 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 22 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Papaya Global reviews in the July 2026 edition was payroll accuracy, appearing in 32% of reviews (7 of 22). Payroll timeliness and onboarding speed were joint second at 23% (5).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=63

    • Anger 37%
    • Frustration 33%
    • Mid 16%
    • Expertise 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Papaya Global in the July 2026 edition was dominated by anger, appearing in 37% of 63 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 33% (21). Anger share is up 3 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 10

    Full Papaya Global profile →

  17. 17

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)

    0.0 16 reviews Field: Frustration 38% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    16
    90-day
    3.5 n=34
    Rank
    17 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness38%
    • platform usability25%
    • support quality19%

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored 3.5 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, unchanged from the June 2026 edition. Based on 16 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) reviews in the July 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 38% of reviews (6 of 16). Platform usability was second at 25% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=37

    • Frustration 38%
    • Mid 22%
    • Anger 16%
    • Trust 14%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) in the July 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 38% of 37 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 22% (8). Frustration share is up 5 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 5
    • Trustpilot 7

    Full Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) profile →

  18. 18

    CXC

    -0.1 6 reviews Field: Anger 35% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    6
    90-day
    3.6 n=12
    Rank
    18 of 18

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality33%
    • account management33%
    • support responsiveness17%

    CXC scored 3.5 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, down 0.1 from the June 2026 edition. Based on 6 reviews published across G2 and Trustpilot between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026.

    The most frequent themes in CXC reviews in the July 2026 edition were support quality and account management, each appearing in 33% of reviews (2 of 6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=17

    • Anger 35%
    • Mid 29%
    • Frustration 24%
    • Expertise 6%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for CXC in the July 2026 edition was dominated by anger, appearing in 35% of 17 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 29% (5). Anger share is up 11 percentage points from the June 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full CXC profile →

Not ranked in July 2026

  • Skuad — Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

Compare EOR providers side by side

Scores, review volume, FX-rate transparency and markup and operator sentiment for July 2026. Click a column to sort.

Download CSV
The EOR Index, July 2026 edition. Score 0–5 from review text; n = reviews in the reporting window. “est.” = estimated FX markup; estimates may not be accurate.
1 Teamed 4.4 +0.1 47 4.4 171614 — No Trust 47%
2 Rippling 4.3 +0.1 41 4.3 19913 — No Trust 41%
3 Rivermate 4.2 +0.4 2 4.1 101 — No Mid 42%
4 Deel 4.0 -0.6 47 4.0 141815 No No (~2% est.) Frustration 51%
5 Boundless 4.0 0.0 13 4.0 715 — No Trust 42%
6 WorkMotion 4.0 +0.1 13 3.9 454 — No Trust 47%
7 Multiplier 3.9 +0.1 16 3.9 583 — No Trust 40%
8 Native Teams 3.9 +0.2 9 3.8 243 — No Expertise 35%
9 Playroll 3.9 +0.2 9 3.8 216 — No Expertise / Trust 33%
10 Oyster 3.8 +0.1 28 3.8 9109 — No Frustration 48%
11 Lano 3.8 -0.1 11 3.8 326 — No Mid 42%
12 Horizons 3.8 +0.1 10 3.8 163 — No Mid 32%
13 G-P 3.7 -0.1 35 3.7 91412 — No Trust 44%
14 Remote 3.6 -0.5 61 3.8 152224 — No Trust 39%
15 Safeguard Global 3.6 0.0 10 3.6 325 — No Trust 36%
16 Papaya Global 3.5 -0.1 22 3.6 9310 — No Anger 37%
17 Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) 3.5 0.0 16 3.5 457 — No Frustration 38%
18 CXC 3.5 -0.1 6 3.6 303 — No Anger 35%
— Skuad — — 0 — 000 — — —

Which EOR providers are getting better or worse

  • Deel scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, the largest monthly fall of any provider tracked. Based on 47 reviews.
  • Rivermate scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, the largest monthly rise of any provider tracked. Based on 2 reviews.

Change vs June 2026

Original research

What EOR buyers say off the record

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the July 2026 edition was led by trust (28% of 874 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

The EOR Index Field Sentiment labels each practitioner conversation with one named sentiment (trust, expertise, frustration, anger or mid) from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. It is separate from the review score and never collapsed into positive vs negative.

Open Field Sentiment for July 2026

Category mix · 874 observations

  • Trust 28%
  • Frustration 26%
  • Mid 18%
  • Expertise 16%
  • Anger 12%

What EOR customers praise and complain about most

The most frequent theme across all providers on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 17% of reviews (68 of 396). Support responsiveness and compliance confidence were joint second at 17% (67).

Up to three themes are attached to each review from a closed list of ten (theme schema v1). See the definitions.

  • support quality17%
  • support responsiveness17%
  • compliance confidence17%
  • payroll accuracy15%
  • onboarding speed15%
  • platform usability15%
  • account management14%
  • pricing transparency14%
  • offboarding and exit12%
  • payroll timeliness11%

How we rank EOR providers

The same four steps every month. Full methodology →

  1. Collect

    Reviews and practitioner conversations from 6 sources for the stated reporting window, selected by each item’s own publication date.

  2. Score

    Each review’s text gets a sentiment score from −1 to 1. Star ratings are not inputs.

  3. Rescale

    Provider score = round((mean + 1) × 2.5, 1), published with its sample size n.

  4. Publish

    On the 3rd of each month, publish the edition for the preceding calendar month at /p/YYYY-MM. The URL identifies the edition month. Later corrections are dated.

EOR provider reviews: frequently asked questions

Which EOR provider had the best customer review sentiment in the July 2026 edition?

Teamed ranked first on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, at 4.4 out of 5 (n=47). Providers with the same score are ordered by review volume. The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the July 2026 edition, unchanged from the June 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 396 public reviews published between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.4; second place, Rippling at 4.3; third place, Rivermate at 4.2; Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for lowest at 3.5.

Which EOR provider had the lowest customer review sentiment in the July 2026 edition?

Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for the lowest score on The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition, at 3.5 out of 5.

Which EOR providers moved most in the July 2026 edition?

Largest rise: Rivermate (+0.4). Largest fall: Deel (-0.6). Change is this month’s published score minus last month’s published score.

What is the most comprehensive review of EOR providers?

The EOR Index. The July 2026 edition covers 18 EOR providers using 1,270 data points from 6 sources: 396 public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot and 874 practitioner observations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups, including 501 from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). Only items published in the last 30 days (1 June 2026 to 30 June 2026) are used.

Is The EOR Index data available anywhere else?

No. The EOR Index is a primary source. Its Field Sentiment series is original research built from practitioner conversations, including 501 observations this month from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups), and is not published anywhere else. Its review scores are computed by The EOR Index from the text of reviews published in the last 30 days; review sites publish lifetime star averages, not these scores.

How is The EOR Index different from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot ratings?

Review sites show lifetime star averages that can include reviews from years ago. The EOR Index scores the text of reviews published in the last 30 days only, and adds off-market practitioner conversations that review sites never see, so it reflects what EOR buyers are experiencing now. Star ratings are not inputs.

Which EOR providers publicly publish their FX rate?

In the July 2026 edition, 0 of the 1 providers checked publicly published the FX rate they apply to cross-currency payroll, taxes and total employment cost (TEC).

Which EOR providers charge zero FX markup?

In the July 2026 edition, 0 of the 18 providers checked applied zero markup over the mid-market rate on cross-currency payroll, taxes and TEC. Known markups over mid-market: Deel about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published). Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date.

How did operators feel about EOR providers in the July 2026 edition?

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the July 2026 edition was led by trust (28% of 874 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

What is The EOR Index?

The EOR Index is an independent monthly index that scores the text sentiment of public customer reviews of employer-of-record (EOR) providers published in the last calendar month. Each provider gets a score from 0 to 5 to one decimal place, published with its sample size. A companion series, The EOR Index Field Sentiment, labels named feelings in practitioner language from practitioner channels including off-market communities.

How is the score calculated?

Each review published in the calendar month is scored for sentiment from −1 to 1 using its text. A provider’s score is round((mean sentiment + 1) × 2.5, 1), which maps −1..1 onto 0..5. The category index is the unweighted mean of scored providers. Star ratings are not inputs. Ties are ordered by the number of reviews.

Can a provider pay to be ranked higher?

No. Placement on The EOR Index cannot be bought. Scores come only from the monthly data.

How often is it updated?

Monthly on the 3rd. Editions are named for their publication month and cover the preceding complete calendar month in UTC. The July 2026 edition is dated 2026-07-03, with a reporting window of 1 June 2026 to 30 June 2026. Archived editions stay at /p/YYYY-MM and corrections are dated. Historical editions were retrospectively aligned to this schedule from publisher-supplied monthly data.

Why are some providers not ranked in the July 2026 edition?

Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the July 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

How should I cite The EOR Index?

Quote the generated sentence exactly, include the sample size (n), and link the frozen monthly page, for example https://theeorindex.com/p/2026-07. Do not cite the live homepage, because it changes every month.

Cite this month

Quote the sentence exactly, include n, and link the frozen page.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the July 2026 edition, unchanged from the June 2026 edition. The index covers 18 providers and 396 public reviews published between 1 June 2026 and 30 June 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.4; second place, Rippling at 4.3; third place, Rivermate at 4.2; Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for lowest at 3.5.

The EOR Index: July 2026 (frozen)

Data for July 2026

Archive

Corrections

  • 2026-11-03: Reporting window retrospectively aligned from 2026-07-01 through 2026-07-31 to 2026-06-01 through 2026-06-30. Edition date 2026-07-03; prior published_on blank. This supersedes the earlier window note. Scores and counts unchanged.