Frozen snapshot 1 July 2026 – 31 July 2026 Published 1 August 2026

The world’s most comprehensive EOR review dataOriginal data, not available anywhere else

The EOR Index: July 2026

Frozen record of July 2026. Built on 392 public reviews and 892 practitioner observations, 507 of them off-market, across 20 EOR providers.

The EOR Index stood at 3.8 in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. The index covers 20 providers and 392 public reviews published between 1 and 31 July 2026. The top three were: first place, Rippling at 4.3; second place, Rivermate at 4.2; third place, Deel at 4.0; Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for lowest at 3.5.

3.8 / 5

Category index · 0.0

392

Public reviews

20

Providers scored

Trust

Dominant field affect · 28%

Why this is the most comprehensive EOR review

1,284

The most comprehensive EOR review

20 EOR providers, 6 data sources and 1,284 data points in July 2026: public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot, plus practitioner conversations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

507

The only EOR review with off-market, proprietary data

507 observations this month came from Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups: conversations between People Ops and global employment operators that public review sites never see. This data is not available anywhere else.

31 days

The only EOR review based on the last 30 days

Every score uses only reviews and conversations published 1 July 2026 – 31 July 2026. Lifetime star averages can be years old; this is a real snapshot of what buyers are experiencing now.

Best EOR providers in July 2026, ranked

20 providers with at least one public review in July 2026, ordered by score (ties by number of reviews). Each card shows the citable sentence, what reviewers wrote about, and how operators feel.

Sort by
  1. Highest public-review sentiment · July 2026
    1

    Rippling

    +0.1 41 reviews Field: Trust 41% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.3 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    41
    90-day
    4.3 n=75
    Rank
    1 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • platform usability29%
    • payroll accuracy24%
    • onboarding speed17%

    Rippling scored 4.3 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 41 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Rippling reviews in July 2026 was platform usability, appearing in 29% of reviews (12 of 41). Payroll accuracy was second at 24% (10).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=73

    • Trust 41%
    • Expertise 29%
    • Mid 12%
    • Frustration 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rippling in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 41% of 73 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 29% (21).

    Review sources

    • G2 19
    • Capterra 9
    • Trustpilot 13

    Full Rippling profile →

  2. 2

    Rivermate

    +0.4 2 reviews Field: Mid 42% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.2 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    2
    90-day
    4.1 n=3
    Rank
    2 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy50%
    • support responsiveness50%
    • onboarding speed50%

    Rivermate scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.4 from June 2026. Based on 2 reviews published across G2 and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Rivermate reviews in July 2026 were payroll accuracy, support responsiveness, onboarding speed and offboarding and exit, each appearing in 50% of reviews (1 of 2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=12

    • Mid 42%
    • Expertise 33%
    • Trust 17%
    • Anger 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rivermate in July 2026 was dominated by mid, appearing in 42% of 12 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 33% (4).

    Review sources

    • G2 1
    • Trustpilot 1

    Full Rivermate profile →

  3. 3

    Deel

    -0.6 47 reviews Field: Frustration 51% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    47
    90-day
    4.0 n=101
    Rank
    3 of 20

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • platform usability32%
    • support responsiveness28%
    • support quality15%

    Deel scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in July 2026, down 0.6 from June 2026. Based on 47 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Deel reviews in July 2026 was platform usability, appearing in 32% of reviews (15 of 47). Support responsiveness was second at 28% (13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=108

    • Frustration 51%
    • Mid 21%
    • Trust 17%
    • Expertise 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Deel in July 2026 was dominated by frustration, appearing in 51% of 108 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 21% (23).

    Review sources

    • G2 14
    • Capterra 18
    • Trustpilot 15

    Full Deel profile →

  4. 4

    Teamed

    0.0 20 reviews Field: Expertise 53% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    20
    90-day
    5.0 n=40
    Rank
    4 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness20%
    • support quality20%
    • onboarding speed20%

    Teamed scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. Based on 20 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Teamed reviews in July 2026 were support responsiveness, support quality, onboarding speed, compliance confidence and platform usability, each appearing in 20% of reviews (4 of 20).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=40

    • Expertise 53%
    • Trust 48%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Teamed in July 2026 was dominated by expertise, appearing in 53% of 40 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Trust was second at 48% (19). Expertise share is down 5 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 8
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Teamed profile →

  5. 5

    Boundless

    0.0 13 reviews Field: Trust 42% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    13
    90-day
    4.0 n=37
    Rank
    5 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy23%
    • onboarding speed23%
    • offboarding and exit23%

    Boundless scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. Based on 13 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Boundless reviews in July 2026 were payroll accuracy, onboarding speed and offboarding and exit, each appearing in 23% of reviews (3 of 13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=50

    • Trust 42%
    • Expertise 30%
    • Mid 12%
    • Frustration 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Boundless in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 42% of 50 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 30% (15).

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 1
    • Trustpilot 5

    Full Boundless profile →

  6. 6

    WorkMotion

    +0.1 13 reviews Field: Trust 47% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    13
    90-day
    3.9 n=29
    Rank
    6 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed31%
    • compliance confidence31%
    • payroll accuracy23%

    WorkMotion scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 13 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in WorkMotion reviews in July 2026 were onboarding speed and compliance confidence, each appearing in 31% of reviews (4 of 13).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=30

    • Trust 47%
    • Expertise 20%
    • Mid 17%
    • Anger 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for WorkMotion in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 47% of 30 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 20% (6). Trust share is up 3 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 5
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full WorkMotion profile →

  7. 7

    Multiplier

    +0.1 16 reviews Field: Trust 40% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    16
    90-day
    3.9 n=39
    Rank
    7 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency31%
    • compliance confidence25%
    • support quality19%

    Multiplier scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 16 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Multiplier reviews in July 2026 was pricing transparency, appearing in 31% of reviews (5 of 16). Compliance confidence was second at 25% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=45

    • Trust 40%
    • Mid 24%
    • Expertise 20%
    • Frustration 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Multiplier in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 40% of 45 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 24% (11).

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 8
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Multiplier profile →

  8. 8

    Native Teams

    +0.2 9 reviews Field: Expertise 35% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    9
    90-day
    3.8 n=18
    Rank
    8 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality33%
    • offboarding and exit33%
    • pricing transparency33%

    Native Teams scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.2 from June 2026. Based on 9 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Native Teams reviews in July 2026 were support quality, offboarding and exit, pricing transparency and account management, each appearing in 33% of reviews (3 of 9).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=20

    • Expertise 35%
    • Mid 25%
    • Trust 25%
    • Frustration 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Native Teams in July 2026 was dominated by expertise, appearing in 35% of 20 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid and trust were joint second at 25% (5 each). Expertise share is down 9 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Native Teams profile →

  9. 9

    Playroll

    +0.2 9 reviews Field: Expertise / Trust 33% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    9
    90-day
    3.8 n=19
    Rank
    9 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency33%
    • support responsiveness22%
    • compliance confidence22%

    Playroll scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.2 from June 2026. Based on 9 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Playroll reviews in July 2026 was pricing transparency, appearing in 33% of reviews (3 of 9). Support responsiveness, compliance confidence and platform usability were joint second at 22% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=24

    • Expertise 33%
    • Trust 33%
    • Anger 13%
    • Frustration 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Playroll in July 2026 was led jointly by expertise and trust, each appearing in 33% of 24 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 1
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Playroll profile →

  10. 10

    Oyster

    +0.1 28 reviews Field: Frustration 48% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    28
    90-day
    3.8 n=55
    Rank
    10 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness25%
    • offboarding and exit25%
    • compliance confidence21%

    Oyster scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 28 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Oyster reviews in July 2026 were support responsiveness and offboarding and exit, each appearing in 25% of reviews (7 of 28).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=85

    • Frustration 48%
    • Anger 32%
    • Mid 8%
    • Expertise 7%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Oyster in July 2026 was dominated by frustration, appearing in 48% of 85 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger was second at 32% (27).

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 10
    • Trustpilot 9

    Full Oyster profile →

  11. 11

    Lano

    -0.1 11 reviews Field: Mid 42% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    11
    90-day
    3.8 n=23
    Rank
    11 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed27%
    • pricing transparency27%
    • support responsiveness9%

    Lano scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in July 2026, down 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 11 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Lano reviews in July 2026 were onboarding speed and pricing transparency, each appearing in 27% of reviews (3 of 11).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=26

    • Mid 42%
    • Frustration 23%
    • Trust 19%
    • Anger 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Lano in July 2026 was dominated by mid, appearing in 42% of 26 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 23% (6).

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Lano profile →

  12. 12

    Horizons

    +0.1 10 reviews Field: Mid 32% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    10
    90-day
    3.8 n=24
    Rank
    12 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed30%
    • payroll accuracy20%
    • support responsiveness20%

    Horizons scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in July 2026, up 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 10 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Horizons reviews in July 2026 was onboarding speed, appearing in 30% of reviews (3 of 10). Payroll accuracy, support responsiveness, offboarding and exit and pricing transparency were joint second at 20% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=28

    • Mid 32%
    • Frustration 29%
    • Trust 25%
    • Anger 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Horizons in July 2026 was dominated by mid, appearing in 32% of 28 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 29% (8).

    Review sources

    • G2 1
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Horizons profile →

  13. 13

    Pebl

    0.0 9 reviews Field: Trust 48% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    9
    90-day
    3.8 n=16
    Rank
    13 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • compliance confidence33%
    • payroll timeliness22%
    • onboarding speed22%

    Pebl scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. Based on 9 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Pebl reviews in July 2026 was compliance confidence, appearing in 33% of reviews (3 of 9). Payroll timeliness, onboarding speed and account management were joint second at 22% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=25

    • Trust 48%
    • Frustration 24%
    • Expertise 16%
    • Mid 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Pebl in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 48% of 25 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 24% (6).

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 2

    Full Pebl profile →

  14. 14

    G-P

    -0.1 35 reviews Field: Trust 44% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    35
    90-day
    3.7 n=60
    Rank
    14 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • account management34%
    • pricing transparency23%
    • compliance confidence20%

    G-P scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in July 2026, down 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 35 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in G-P reviews in July 2026 was account management, appearing in 34% of reviews (12 of 35). Pricing transparency was second at 23% (8).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=61

    • Trust 44%
    • Mid 20%
    • Frustration 18%
    • Anger 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for G-P in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 44% of 61 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 20% (12). Trust share is up 4 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 14
    • Trustpilot 12

    Full G-P profile →

  15. 15

    Omnipresent

    -0.1 14 reviews Field: Frustration 43% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    14
    90-day
    3.7 n=28
    Rank
    15 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • offboarding and exit29%
    • support quality21%
    • payroll timeliness14%

    Omnipresent scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in July 2026, down 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 14 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Omnipresent reviews in July 2026 was offboarding and exit, appearing in 29% of reviews (4 of 14). Support quality was second at 21% (3).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=28

    • Frustration 43%
    • Anger 21%
    • Trust 18%
    • Mid 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Omnipresent in July 2026 was dominated by frustration, appearing in 43% of 28 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger was second at 21% (6).

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 6

    Full Omnipresent profile →

  16. 16

    Remote

    -0.5 61 reviews Field: Trust 39% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    61
    90-day
    3.8 n=92
    Rank
    16 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality34%
    • account management25%
    • compliance confidence21%

    Remote scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in July 2026, down 0.5 from June 2026. Based on 61 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Remote reviews in July 2026 was support quality, appearing in 34% of reviews (21 of 61). Account management was second at 25% (15).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=87

    • Trust 39%
    • Frustration 32%
    • Expertise 16%
    • Mid 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Remote in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 39% of 87 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 32% (28). Trust share is down 9 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 15
    • Capterra 22
    • Trustpilot 24

    Full Remote profile →

  17. 17

    Safeguard Global

    0.0 10 reviews Field: Trust 36% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    10
    90-day
    3.6 n=27
    Rank
    17 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality40%
    • onboarding speed20%
    • offboarding and exit20%

    Safeguard Global scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. Based on 10 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Safeguard Global reviews in July 2026 was support quality, appearing in 40% of reviews (4 of 10). Onboarding speed, offboarding and exit and account management were joint second at 20% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=33

    • Trust 36%
    • Mid 24%
    • Anger 21%
    • Frustration 15%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Safeguard Global in July 2026 was dominated by trust, appearing in 36% of 33 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 24% (8). Trust share is up 3 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 5

    Full Safeguard Global profile →

  18. 18

    Papaya Global

    -0.1 22 reviews Field: Anger 37% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    22
    90-day
    3.6 n=45
    Rank
    18 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy32%
    • payroll timeliness23%
    • onboarding speed23%

    Papaya Global scored 3.5 on The EOR Index in July 2026, down 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 22 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Papaya Global reviews in July 2026 was payroll accuracy, appearing in 32% of reviews (7 of 22). Payroll timeliness and onboarding speed were joint second at 23% (5).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=63

    • Anger 37%
    • Frustration 33%
    • Mid 16%
    • Expertise 10%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Papaya Global in July 2026 was dominated by anger, appearing in 37% of 63 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 33% (21). Anger share is up 3 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 9
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 10

    Full Papaya Global profile →

  19. 19

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)

    0.0 16 reviews Field: Frustration 38% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    16
    90-day
    3.5 n=34
    Rank
    19 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness38%
    • platform usability25%
    • support quality19%

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored 3.5 on The EOR Index in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. Based on 16 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) reviews in July 2026 was support responsiveness, appearing in 38% of reviews (6 of 16). Platform usability was second at 25% (4).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=37

    • Frustration 38%
    • Mid 22%
    • Anger 16%
    • Trust 14%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) in July 2026 was dominated by frustration, appearing in 38% of 37 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 22% (8). Frustration share is up 5 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 4
    • Capterra 5
    • Trustpilot 7

    Full Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) profile →

  20. 20

    CXC

    -0.1 6 reviews Field: Anger 35% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    6
    90-day
    3.6 n=12
    Rank
    20 of 20

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality33%
    • account management33%
    • support responsiveness17%

    CXC scored 3.5 on The EOR Index in July 2026, down 0.1 from June 2026. Based on 6 reviews published across G2 and Trustpilot between 1 and 31 July 2026.

    The most frequent themes in CXC reviews in July 2026 were support quality and account management, each appearing in 33% of reviews (2 of 6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug

    Field Sentiment · n=17

    • Anger 35%
    • Mid 29%
    • Frustration 24%
    • Expertise 6%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for CXC in July 2026 was dominated by anger, appearing in 35% of 17 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 29% (5). Anger share is up 11 percentage points from June 2026.

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full CXC profile →

Not ranked in July 2026

  • Skuad — Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in July 2026. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

Compare EOR providers side by side

Scores, review volume, FX-rate transparency and markup and operator sentiment for July 2026. Click a column to sort.

Download CSV
The EOR Index, July 2026. Score 0–5 from review text; n = reviews published in the month. “est.” = estimated FX markup; estimates may not be accurate.
1 Rippling 4.3 +0.1 41 4.3 19913 No Trust 41%
2 Rivermate 4.2 +0.4 2 4.1 101 No Mid 42%
3 Deel 4.0 -0.6 47 4.0 141815 No No (~2% est.) Frustration 51%
4 Teamed 4.0 0.0 20 5.0 866 No Expertise 53%
5 Boundless 4.0 0.0 13 4.0 715 No Trust 42%
6 WorkMotion 4.0 +0.1 13 3.9 454 No Trust 47%
7 Multiplier 3.9 +0.1 16 3.9 583 No Trust 40%
8 Native Teams 3.9 +0.2 9 3.8 243 No Expertise 35%
9 Playroll 3.9 +0.2 9 3.8 216 No Expertise / Trust 33%
10 Oyster 3.8 +0.1 28 3.8 9109 No Frustration 48%
11 Lano 3.8 -0.1 11 3.8 326 No Mid 42%
12 Horizons 3.8 +0.1 10 3.8 163 No Mid 32%
13 Pebl 3.8 0.0 9 3.8 432 No Trust 48%
14 G-P 3.7 -0.1 35 3.7 91412 No Trust 44%
15 Omnipresent 3.7 -0.1 14 3.7 266 No Frustration 43%
16 Remote 3.6 -0.5 61 3.8 152224 No Trust 39%
17 Safeguard Global 3.6 0.0 10 3.6 325 No Trust 36%
18 Papaya Global 3.5 -0.1 22 3.6 9310 No Anger 37%
19 Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) 3.5 0.0 16 3.5 457 No Frustration 38%
20 CXC 3.5 -0.1 6 3.6 303 No Anger 35%
Skuad 0 000

Which EOR providers are getting better or worse

  • Deel scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in July 2026, the largest monthly fall of any provider tracked. Based on 47 reviews.
  • Rivermate scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in July 2026, the largest monthly rise of any provider tracked. Based on 2 reviews.

Change vs June 2026

Original research

What EOR buyers say off the record

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in July 2026 was led by trust (28% of 892 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

The EOR Index Field Sentiment labels each practitioner conversation with one named sentiment (trust, expertise, frustration, anger or mid) from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. It is separate from the review score and never collapsed into positive vs negative.

Open Field Sentiment for July 2026

Category mix · 892 observations

  • Trust 28%
  • Frustration 26%
  • Mid 17%
  • Expertise 16%
  • Anger 13%

What EOR customers praise and complain about most

The most frequent theme across all providers on The EOR Index in July 2026 was compliance confidence, appearing in 17% of reviews (67 of 392). Support quality was second at 17% (65).

Up to three themes are attached to each review from a closed list of ten (theme schema v1). See the definitions.

  • compliance confidence17%
  • support quality17%
  • support responsiveness16%
  • account management15%
  • onboarding speed15%
  • platform usability15%
  • payroll accuracy14%
  • pricing transparency14%
  • offboarding and exit13%
  • payroll timeliness10%

How we rank EOR providers

The same four steps every month. Full methodology →

  1. Collect

    Reviews and practitioner conversations published in the last 31 days from 6 sources, selected by each item’s own publication date.

  2. Score

    Each review’s text gets a sentiment score from −1 to 1. Star ratings are not inputs.

  3. Rescale

    Provider score = round((mean + 1) × 2.5, 1), published with its sample size n.

  4. Freeze

    On the 1st of the next month the snapshot is frozen at /p/YYYY-MM. Later errors get a dated correction.

EOR provider reviews: frequently asked questions

Which EOR provider had the best customer review sentiment in July 2026?

Rippling ranked first on The EOR Index in July 2026, at 4.3 out of 5 (n=41). Providers with the same score are ordered by review volume. The EOR Index stood at 3.8 in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. The index covers 20 providers and 392 public reviews published between 1 and 31 July 2026. The top three were: first place, Rippling at 4.3; second place, Rivermate at 4.2; third place, Deel at 4.0; Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for lowest at 3.5.

Which EOR provider had the lowest customer review sentiment in July 2026?

Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for the lowest score on The EOR Index in July 2026, at 3.5 out of 5.

Which EOR providers moved most in July 2026?

Largest rise: Rivermate (+0.4). Largest fall: Deel (-0.6). Change is this month’s published score minus last month’s published score.

What is the most comprehensive review of EOR providers?

The EOR Index. For July 2026 it covers 20 EOR providers using 1,284 data points from 6 sources: 392 public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot and 892 practitioner observations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups, including 507 from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). Only items published in the last 31 days (1 July 2026 to 31 July 2026) are used.

Is The EOR Index data available anywhere else?

No. The EOR Index is a primary source. Its Field Sentiment series is original research built from practitioner conversations, including 507 observations this month from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups), and is not published anywhere else. Its review scores are computed by The EOR Index from the text of reviews published in the last 31 days; review sites publish lifetime star averages, not these scores.

How is The EOR Index different from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot ratings?

Review sites show lifetime star averages that can include reviews from years ago. The EOR Index scores the text of reviews published in the last 31 days only, and adds off-market practitioner conversations that review sites never see, so it reflects what EOR buyers are experiencing now. Star ratings are not inputs.

Which EOR providers publicly publish their FX rate?

In July 2026, 0 of the 1 providers checked publicly published the FX rate they apply to cross-currency payroll, taxes and total employment cost (TEC).

Which EOR providers charge zero FX markup?

In July 2026, 0 of the 20 providers checked applied zero markup over the mid-market rate on cross-currency payroll, taxes and TEC. Known markups over mid-market: Deel about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published). Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date.

How did operators feel about EOR providers in July 2026?

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in July 2026 was led by trust (28% of 892 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

What is The EOR Index?

The EOR Index is an independent monthly index that scores the text sentiment of public customer reviews of employer-of-record (EOR) providers published in the last calendar month. Each provider gets a score from 0 to 5 to one decimal place, published with its sample size. A companion series, The EOR Index Field Sentiment, labels named feelings in practitioner language from practitioner channels including off-market communities.

How is the score calculated?

Each review published in the calendar month is scored for sentiment from −1 to 1 using its text. A provider’s score is round((mean sentiment + 1) × 2.5, 1), which maps −1..1 onto 0..5. The category index is the unweighted mean of scored providers. Star ratings are not inputs. Ties are ordered by the number of reviews.

Can a provider pay to be ranked higher?

No. Placement on The EOR Index cannot be bought. Scores come only from the monthly data.

How often is it updated?

Monthly. Each month is frozen on the 1st of the following month (UTC) and published at /p/YYYY-MM. Frozen pages are not edited afterwards; errors get a dated correction. July 2026 was published on 2026-08-01.

Why are some providers not ranked in July 2026?

Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in July 2026. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

How should I cite The EOR Index?

Quote the generated sentence exactly, include the sample size (n), and link the frozen monthly page, for example https://theeorindex.com/p/2026-07. Do not cite the live homepage, because it changes every month.

Cite this month

Quote the sentence exactly, include n, and link the frozen page.

The EOR Index stood at 3.8 in July 2026, unchanged from June 2026. The index covers 20 providers and 392 public reviews published between 1 and 31 July 2026. The top three were: first place, Rippling at 4.3; second place, Rivermate at 4.2; third place, Deel at 4.0; Papaya Global, Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) and CXC tied for lowest at 3.5.

The EOR Index: July 2026 (frozen)

Data for July 2026

Archive

Corrections

No corrections have been issued for July 2026.