Frozen snapshot 1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026 Edition 3 September 2026

The world’s most comprehensive EOR review dataOriginal data, not available anywhere else

The EOR Index: September 2026

September 2026 edition. Reporting window: 1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026. Built on 400 public reviews and 827 practitioner observations, 478 of them off-market, across 18 EOR providers.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the September 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. The index covers 17 providers and 400 public reviews published between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.5; second place, Rippling at 4.5; third place, Deel at 4.3; Papaya Global scored lowest at 3.4.

3.9 / 5

Category index · +0.1

400

Public reviews

17

Providers scored

Trust

Dominant field affect · 31%

Why this is the most comprehensive EOR review

1,227

The most comprehensive EOR review

18 EOR providers, 6 data sources and 1,227 data points in the September 2026 edition: public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot, plus practitioner conversations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

478

The only EOR review with off-market, proprietary data

478 observations this month came from Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups: conversations between People Ops and global employment operators that public review sites never see. This data is not available anywhere else.

31 days

Current monthly EOR review scores

Every score uses only reviews and conversations published 1 August 2026 – 31 August 2026. Lifetime star averages can be years old; this is a real snapshot of what buyers are experiencing now.

Best EOR providers in September 2026, ranked

17 providers with at least one public review in this edition’s reporting window, ordered by score (ties by number of reviews). Each card shows the citable sentence, what reviewers wrote about, and how operators feel.

Sort by
  1. Highest public-review sentiment · September 2026
    1

    Teamed

    0.0 60 reviews Field: Trust 54% Zero FX markup
    Score
    4.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    60
    90-day
    4.5 n=161
    Rank
    1 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality25%
    • support responsiveness23%
    • payroll accuracy22%

    Teamed scored 4.5 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, unchanged from the August 2026 edition. Based on 60 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Teamed reviews in the September 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 25% of reviews (15 of 60). Support responsiveness was second at 23% (14).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=95

    • Trust 54%
    • Expertise 29%
    • Mid 8%
    • Frustration 6%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Teamed in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 54% of 95 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 29% (28). Trust share is up 3 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 22
    • Capterra 20
    • Trustpilot 18

    Full Teamed profile →

  2. 2

    Rippling

    +0.3 31 reviews Field: Trust 47% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.5 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    31
    90-day
    4.3 n=104
    Rank
    2 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy29%
    • onboarding speed29%
    • support responsiveness16%

    Rippling scored 4.5 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.3 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 31 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Rippling reviews in the September 2026 edition were payroll accuracy and onboarding speed, each appearing in 29% of reviews (9 of 31).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=62

    • Trust 47%
    • Expertise 34%
    • Mid 10%
    • Frustration 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Rippling in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 47% of 62 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 34% (21). Trust share is up 5 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 12
    • Trustpilot 12

    Full Rippling profile →

  3. 3

    Deel

    +0.3 45 reviews Field: Frustration 55% FX rate not public FX markup ~2% est.
    Score
    4.3 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    45
    90-day
    3.9 n=154
    Rank
    3 of 17

    FX markup is an estimate. Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date. How we estimate

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness24%
    • onboarding speed22%
    • compliance confidence20%

    Deel scored 4.3 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.3 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 45 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Deel reviews in the September 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 24% of reviews (11 of 45). Onboarding speed was second at 22% (10).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=85

    • Frustration 55%
    • Mid 26%
    • Trust 12%
    • Anger 4%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Deel in the September 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 55% of 85 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 26% (22).

    Review sources

    • G2 16
    • Capterra 12
    • Trustpilot 17

    Full Deel profile →

  4. 4

    Multiplier

    +0.3 19 reviews Field: Trust 40% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.2 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    19
    90-day
    4.0 n=65
    Rank
    4 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality26%
    • pricing transparency26%
    • platform usability26%

    Multiplier scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.3 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 19 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Multiplier reviews in the September 2026 edition were support quality, pricing transparency and platform usability, each appearing in 26% of reviews (5 of 19).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=55

    • Trust 40%
    • Expertise 27%
    • Mid 18%
    • Frustration 11%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Multiplier in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 40% of 55 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 27% (15).

    Review sources

    • G2 8
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 8

    Full Multiplier profile →

  5. 5

    Boundless

    -0.1 17 reviews Field: Trust 41% FX markup charged
    Score
    4.0 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    17
    90-day
    4.0 n=42
    Rank
    5 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed35%
    • compliance confidence29%
    • payroll accuracy18%

    Boundless scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, down 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 17 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Boundless reviews in the September 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 35% of reviews (6 of 17). Compliance confidence was second at 29% (5).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=39

    • Trust 41%
    • Expertise 31%
    • Frustration 13%
    • Mid 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Boundless in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 41% of 39 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 31% (12).

    Review sources

    • G2 6
    • Capterra 9
    • Trustpilot 2

    Full Boundless profile →

  6. 6

    Remote

    +0.1 54 reviews Field: Trust 57% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    54
    90-day
    3.8 n=166
    Rank
    6 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support quality31%
    • account management26%
    • compliance confidence20%

    Remote scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 54 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Remote reviews in the September 2026 edition was support quality, appearing in 31% of reviews (17 of 54). Account management was second at 26% (14).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=77

    • Trust 57%
    • Frustration 16%
    • Expertise 13%
    • Mid 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Remote in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 57% of 77 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 16% (12). Trust share is up 11 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 12
    • Capterra 24
    • Trustpilot 18

    Full Remote profile →

  7. 7

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global)

    +0.2 18 reviews Field: Frustration 43% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    18
    90-day
    3.7 n=45
    Rank
    7 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll timeliness28%
    • account management28%
    • payroll accuracy17%

    Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.2 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 18 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) reviews in the September 2026 edition were payroll timeliness and account management, each appearing in 28% of reviews (5 of 18).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=37

    • Frustration 43%
    • Mid 30%
    • Anger 14%
    • Trust 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) in the September 2026 edition was dominated by frustration, appearing in 43% of 37 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Mid was second at 30% (11). Frustration share is up 4 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 8

    Full Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) profile →

  8. 8

    WorkMotion

    0.0 12 reviews Field: Trust 47% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    12
    90-day
    3.9 n=35
    Rank
    8 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed25%
    • payroll accuracy17%
    • support quality17%

    WorkMotion scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, unchanged from the August 2026 edition. Based on 12 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in WorkMotion reviews in the September 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 25% of reviews (3 of 12). Payroll accuracy, support quality, compliance confidence and pricing transparency were joint second at 17% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=32

    • Trust 47%
    • Expertise 22%
    • Mid 16%
    • Anger 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for WorkMotion in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 47% of 32 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 22% (7).

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 5
    • Trustpilot 2

    Full WorkMotion profile →

  9. 9

    Playroll

    +0.1 11 reviews Field: Trust 41% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.9 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    11
    90-day
    3.8 n=29
    Rank
    9 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • platform usability36%
    • support responsiveness27%
    • compliance confidence27%

    Playroll scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 11 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Playroll reviews in the September 2026 edition was platform usability, appearing in 36% of reviews (4 of 11). Support responsiveness and compliance confidence were joint second at 27% (3).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=22

    • Trust 41%
    • Expertise 32%
    • Mid 14%
    • Frustration 9%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Playroll in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 41% of 22 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 32% (7). Trust share is up 11 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 5
    • Capterra 2
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full Playroll profile →

  10. 10

    Oyster

    0.0 31 reviews Field: Anger 47% FX markup 2% Editorial override
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    31
    90-day
    3.5 n=83
    Rank
    10 of 17

    Override. Model score 2.9, published 3.8. Manual override: model over-weighted a cluster of short Trustpilot complaints that restated the same payroll delay.

    What reviewers wrote about

    • onboarding speed23%
    • pricing transparency19%
    • account management19%

    Oyster scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, unchanged from the August 2026 edition. Based on 31 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Oyster reviews in the September 2026 edition was onboarding speed, appearing in 23% of reviews (7 of 31). Pricing transparency and account management were joint second at 19% (6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=77

    • Anger 47%
    • Frustration 42%
    • Mid 5%
    • Expertise 4%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Oyster in the September 2026 edition was dominated by anger, appearing in 47% of 77 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 42% (32). Anger share is up 11 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 11
    • Capterra 13
    • Trustpilot 7

    Full Oyster profile →

  11. 11

    G-P

    +0.1 30 reviews Field: Trust 38% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    30
    90-day
    3.8 n=102
    Rank
    11 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency27%
    • compliance confidence23%
    • support quality20%

    G-P scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 30 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in G-P reviews in the September 2026 edition was pricing transparency, appearing in 27% of reviews (8 of 30). Compliance confidence was second at 23% (7).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=60

    • Trust 38%
    • Frustration 20%
    • Mid 20%
    • Anger 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for G-P in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 38% of 60 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration and mid were joint second at 20% (12 each). Trust share is down 5 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 10
    • Capterra 10
    • Trustpilot 10

    Full G-P profile →

  12. 12

    Horizons

    +0.3 9 reviews Field: Mid 29% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.8 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    9
    90-day
    3.7 n=24
    Rank
    12 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll accuracy44%
    • onboarding speed33%
    • payroll timeliness22%

    Horizons scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.3 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 9 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Horizons reviews in the September 2026 edition was payroll accuracy, appearing in 44% of reviews (4 of 9). Onboarding speed was second at 33% (3).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=35

    • Mid 29%
    • Expertise 26%
    • Frustration 23%
    • Trust 17%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Horizons in the September 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 29% of 35 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Expertise was second at 26% (9). Mid share is up 3 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Capterra 3
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Horizons profile →

  13. 13

    Lano

    -0.1 15 reviews Field: Mid 46% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    15
    90-day
    3.8 n=38
    Rank
    13 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness27%
    • pricing transparency20%
    • platform usability20%

    Lano scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, down 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 15 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Lano reviews in the September 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 27% of reviews (4 of 15). Pricing transparency and platform usability were joint second at 20% (3).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=26

    • Mid 46%
    • Trust 23%
    • Frustration 19%
    • Anger 8%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Lano in the September 2026 edition was dominated by mid, appearing in 46% of 26 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Trust was second at 23% (6).

    Review sources

    • G2 7
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 4

    Full Lano profile →

  14. 14

    Native Teams

    +0.2 7 reviews Field: Expertise 45% FX markup charged
    Score
    3.7 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    7
    90-day
    3.7 n=23
    Rank
    14 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • support responsiveness29%
    • payroll accuracy14%
    • payroll timeliness14%

    Native Teams scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.2 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 7 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Native Teams reviews in the September 2026 edition was support responsiveness, appearing in 29% of reviews (2 of 7). Payroll accuracy, payroll timeliness, onboarding speed, offboarding and exit, pricing transparency and account management were joint second at 14% (1).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=20

    • Expertise 45%
    • Trust 20%
    • Frustration 15%
    • Mid 15%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Native Teams in the September 2026 edition was dominated by expertise, appearing in 45% of 20 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Trust was second at 20% (4). Expertise share is up 3 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 4
    • Trustpilot 1

    Full Native Teams profile →

  15. 15

    Safeguard Global

    0.0 12 reviews Field: Trust 36% FX markup 2%
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    12
    90-day
    3.6 n=36
    Rank
    15 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • compliance confidence25%
    • pricing transparency25%
    • support responsiveness17%

    Safeguard Global scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, unchanged from the August 2026 edition. Based on 12 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent themes in Safeguard Global reviews in the September 2026 edition were compliance confidence and pricing transparency, each appearing in 25% of reviews (3 of 12).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=25

    • Trust 36%
    • Anger 24%
    • Mid 24%
    • Frustration 12%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Safeguard Global in the September 2026 edition was dominated by trust, appearing in 36% of 25 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Anger and mid were joint second at 24% (6 each). Trust share is down 3 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 3
    • Capterra 6
    • Trustpilot 3

    Full Safeguard Global profile →

  16. 16

    CXC

    -0.1 5 reviews Field: Anger / Frustration / Mid 27% FX markup 2%
    Score
    3.6 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    5
    90-day
    3.6 n=17
    Rank
    16 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • payroll timeliness60%
    • payroll accuracy40%
    • support responsiveness40%

    CXC scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, down 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 5 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in CXC reviews in the September 2026 edition was payroll timeliness, appearing in 60% of reviews (3 of 5). Payroll accuracy, support responsiveness and offboarding and exit were joint second at 40% (2).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=15

    • Anger 27%
    • Frustration 27%
    • Mid 27%
    • Expertise 13%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for CXC in the September 2026 edition was led jointly by anger, frustration and mid, each appearing in 27% of 15 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups.

    Review sources

    • G2 2
    • Capterra 1
    • Trustpilot 2

    Full CXC profile →

  17. 17

    Papaya Global

    +0.2 24 reviews Field: Anger 49% FX markup 2%
    Score
    3.4 / 5
    Reviews (n)
    24
    90-day
    3.3 n=72
    Rank
    17 of 17

    What reviewers wrote about

    • pricing transparency33%
    • payroll timeliness25%
    • compliance confidence21%

    Papaya Global scored 3.4 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, up 0.2 from the August 2026 edition. Based on 24 reviews published across G2, Capterra and Trustpilot between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026.

    The most frequent theme in Papaya Global reviews in the September 2026 edition was pricing transparency, appearing in 33% of reviews (8 of 24). Payroll timeliness was second at 25% (6).

    Cite the frozen page

    Score by month

    Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov

    Field Sentiment · n=51

    • Anger 49%
    • Frustration 29%
    • Mid 12%
    • Expertise 6%

    The EOR Index Field Sentiment for Papaya Global in the September 2026 edition was dominated by anger, appearing in 49% of 51 field observations drawn from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. Frustration was second at 29% (15). Anger share is up 13 percentage points from the August 2026 edition.

    Review sources

    • G2 8
    • Capterra 11
    • Trustpilot 5

    Full Papaya Global profile →

Not ranked in September 2026

  • Rivermate — No public reviews of Rivermate published between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026 were included in the September 2026 edition, so The EOR Index does not publish a score for Rivermate.
  • Skuad — Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

Compare EOR providers side by side

Scores, review volume, FX-rate transparency and markup and operator sentiment for September 2026. Click a column to sort.

Download CSV
The EOR Index, September 2026 edition. Score 0–5 from review text; n = reviews in the reporting window. “est.” = estimated FX markup; estimates may not be accurate.
1 Teamed 4.5 0.0 60 4.5 222018 — Yes Trust 54%
2 Rippling 4.5 +0.3 31 4.3 71212 — No Trust 47%
3 Deel 4.3 +0.3 45 3.9 161217 No No (~2% est.) Frustration 55%
4 Multiplier 4.2 +0.3 19 4.0 838 — No Trust 40%
5 Boundless 4.0 -0.1 17 4.0 692 — No Trust 41%
6 Remote 3.9 +0.1 54 3.8 122418 — No Trust 57%
7 Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) 3.9 +0.2 18 3.7 738 — No Frustration 43%
8 WorkMotion 3.9 0.0 12 3.9 552 — No Trust 47%
9 Playroll 3.9 +0.1 11 3.8 524 — No Trust 41%
10 Oyster 3.8override 0.0 31 3.5 11137 — No (2%) Anger 47%
11 G-P 3.8 +0.1 30 3.8 101010 — No Trust 38%
12 Horizons 3.8 +0.3 9 3.7 333 — No Mid 29%
13 Lano 3.7 -0.1 15 3.8 744 — No Mid 46%
14 Native Teams 3.7 +0.2 7 3.7 241 — No Expertise 45%
15 Safeguard Global 3.6 0.0 12 3.6 363 — No (2%) Trust 36%
16 CXC 3.6 -0.1 5 3.6 212 — No (2%) Anger / Frustration / Mid 27%
17 Papaya Global 3.4 +0.2 24 3.3 8115 — No (2%) Anger 49%
— Rivermate — — 0 4.1 000 — No (2%) Mid 36%
— Skuad — — 0 — 000 — — —

Which EOR providers are getting better or worse

  • Boundless scored 4.0 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, tied for the largest monthly fall of any provider tracked. Based on 17 reviews.
  • Lano scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, tied for the largest monthly fall of any provider tracked. Based on 15 reviews.
  • CXC scored 3.6 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, tied for the largest monthly fall of any provider tracked. Based on 5 reviews.
  • Rippling scored 4.5 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, tied for the largest monthly rise of any provider tracked. Based on 31 reviews.
  • Deel scored 4.3 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, tied for the largest monthly rise of any provider tracked. Based on 45 reviews.
  • Multiplier scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, tied for the largest monthly rise of any provider tracked. Based on 19 reviews.
  • Horizons scored 3.8 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, tied for the largest monthly rise of any provider tracked. Based on 9 reviews.
  • Rippling scored 4.5 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, its highest score since the June 2026 edition. Based on 31 reviews.
  • Multiplier scored 4.2 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, its highest score since the June 2026 edition. Based on 19 reviews.
  • Pebl (formerly Velocity Global) scored 3.9 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, its highest score since the June 2026 edition. Based on 18 reviews.
  • Lano scored 3.7 on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, its lowest score since the June 2026 edition. Based on 15 reviews.

Change vs August 2026

Original research

What EOR buyers say off the record

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the September 2026 edition was led by trust (31% of 827 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

The EOR Index Field Sentiment labels each practitioner conversation with one named sentiment (trust, expertise, frustration, anger or mid) from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups. It is separate from the review score and never collapsed into positive vs negative.

Open Field Sentiment for September 2026

Category mix · 827 observations

  • Trust 31%
  • Frustration 22%
  • Expertise 17%
  • Mid 17%
  • Anger 13%

What EOR customers praise and complain about most

The most frequent themes across all providers on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition were support quality and compliance confidence, each appearing in 18% of reviews (71 of 400).

Up to three themes are attached to each review from a closed list of ten (theme schema v1). See the definitions.

  • support quality18%
  • compliance confidence18%
  • payroll accuracy17%
  • onboarding speed17%
  • pricing transparency17%
  • support responsiveness16%
  • payroll timeliness16%
  • account management16%
  • platform usability14%
  • offboarding and exit11%

How we rank EOR providers

The same four steps every month. Full methodology →

  1. Collect

    Reviews and practitioner conversations from 6 sources for the stated reporting window, selected by each item’s own publication date.

  2. Score

    Each review’s text gets a sentiment score from −1 to 1. Star ratings are not inputs.

  3. Rescale

    Provider score = round((mean + 1) × 2.5, 1), published with its sample size n.

  4. Publish

    On the 3rd of each month, publish the edition for the preceding calendar month at /p/YYYY-MM. The URL identifies the edition month. Later corrections are dated.

EOR provider reviews: frequently asked questions

Which EOR provider had the best customer review sentiment in the September 2026 edition?

Teamed ranked first on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, at 4.5 out of 5 (n=60). Providers with the same score are ordered by review volume. The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the September 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. The index covers 17 providers and 400 public reviews published between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.5; second place, Rippling at 4.5; third place, Deel at 4.3; Papaya Global scored lowest at 3.4.

Which EOR provider had the lowest customer review sentiment in the September 2026 edition?

Papaya Global had the lowest score on The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition, at 3.4 out of 5.

Which EOR providers moved most in the September 2026 edition?

Largest rise: Rippling, Deel, Multiplier and Horizons (+0.3). Largest fall: Boundless, Lano and CXC (-0.1). Change is this month’s published score minus last month’s published score.

What is the most comprehensive review of EOR providers?

The EOR Index. The September 2026 edition covers 18 EOR providers using 1,227 data points from 6 sources: 400 public reviews from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot and 827 practitioner observations from LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups, including 478 from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). Only items published in the last 31 days (1 August 2026 to 31 August 2026) are used.

Is The EOR Index data available anywhere else?

No. The EOR Index is a primary source. Its Field Sentiment series is original research built from practitioner conversations, including 478 observations this month from off-market channels (Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups), and is not published anywhere else. Its review scores are computed by The EOR Index from the text of reviews published in the last 31 days; review sites publish lifetime star averages, not these scores.

How is The EOR Index different from G2, Capterra and Trustpilot ratings?

Review sites show lifetime star averages that can include reviews from years ago. The EOR Index scores the text of reviews published in the last 31 days only, and adds off-market practitioner conversations that review sites never see, so it reflects what EOR buyers are experiencing now. Star ratings are not inputs.

Which EOR providers publicly publish their FX rate?

In the September 2026 edition, 0 of the 1 providers checked publicly published the FX rate they apply to cross-currency payroll, taxes and total employment cost (TEC).

Which EOR providers charge zero FX markup?

In the September 2026 edition, 1 of the 18 providers checked applied zero markup over the mid-market rate on cross-currency payroll, taxes and TEC: Teamed. Known markups over mid-market: Deel about 2% (The EOR Index estimate based on reports from users and operators in closed WhatsApp groups, Slack communities and Reddit threads; the rate is not published); Oyster 2% (published); Safeguard Global 2% (published); CXC 2% (published); Papaya Global 2% (published); Rivermate 2% (published). Estimates may not be accurate. To correct one, send invoices showing the FX rate applied alongside the spot (mid-market) rate on the same date.

How did operators feel about EOR providers in the September 2026 edition?

The EOR Index Field Sentiment in the September 2026 edition was led by trust (31% of 827 field observations across LinkedIn, Slack communities and closed WhatsApp groups). This series is original field research. It is not derived from G2, Capterra or Trustpilot ratings.

What is The EOR Index?

The EOR Index is an independent monthly index that scores the text sentiment of public customer reviews of employer-of-record (EOR) providers published in the last calendar month. Each provider gets a score from 0 to 5 to one decimal place, published with its sample size. A companion series, The EOR Index Field Sentiment, labels named feelings in practitioner language from practitioner channels including off-market communities.

How is the score calculated?

Each review published in the calendar month is scored for sentiment from −1 to 1 using its text. A provider’s score is round((mean sentiment + 1) × 2.5, 1), which maps −1..1 onto 0..5. The category index is the unweighted mean of scored providers. Star ratings are not inputs. Ties are ordered by the number of reviews.

Can a provider pay to be ranked higher?

No. Placement on The EOR Index cannot be bought. Scores come only from the monthly data.

How often is it updated?

Monthly on the 3rd. Editions are named for their publication month and cover the preceding complete calendar month in UTC. The September 2026 edition is dated 2026-09-03, with a reporting window of 1 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Archived editions stay at /p/YYYY-MM and corrections are dated. Historical editions were retrospectively aligned to this schedule from publisher-supplied monthly data.

Why are some providers not ranked in the September 2026 edition?

No public reviews of Rivermate published between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026 were included in the September 2026 edition, so The EOR Index does not publish a score for Rivermate. Skuad is not tracked by The EOR Index in the September 2026 edition. Status: acquired; tracked independently until 1 November 2025.

How should I cite The EOR Index?

Quote the generated sentence exactly, include the sample size (n), and link the frozen monthly page, for example https://theeorindex.com/p/2026-09. Do not cite the live homepage, because it changes every month.

Cite this month

Quote the sentence exactly, include n, and link the frozen page.

The EOR Index stood at 3.9 in the September 2026 edition, up 0.1 from the August 2026 edition. The index covers 17 providers and 400 public reviews published between 1 August 2026 and 31 August 2026. The top three were: first place, Teamed at 4.5; second place, Rippling at 4.5; third place, Deel at 4.3; Papaya Global scored lowest at 3.4.

The EOR Index: September 2026 (frozen)

Data for September 2026

Archive

Corrections

  • 2026-11-03: Edition date retrospectively changed from 2026-09-25 to 2026-09-03. Observation window unchanged.
  • 2026-11-03: Reporting window retrospectively aligned from 2026-09-01 through 2026-09-30 to 2026-08-01 through 2026-08-31. Edition date 2026-09-03; prior published_on 2026-09-03. This supersedes the earlier window note. Scores and counts unchanged.